Laserfiche WebLink
SENT BY�CALIF LAB SERVICES ;10- 4-95 ; 10'33 CALIF LAB SERVICES- <br /> J �0g5991652;# 2f 3 <br /> Edo No. 95054-13 <br /> �••--� July 31, 1995 <br /> California Laboratory Semces <br /> 3249 Fitzgerald Road <br /> Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 <br /> "s Attention. Donna Dessosiera <br /> u <br /> z Subject CALWORNU X ABORATORY SERVICES JOB NO.N4181 <br /> = LABORATORY TICST RESULTS <br /> U <br /> Ma <br /> r• Dcar Donna. <br /> 0 <br /> w Anderson ConsuMng Group recen►ed three evil sampics from you&r laboratory <br /> ° analysis. The samples were eontamed In brass liwo and were identified as MW-2-31, <br /> S$-9-30, and SB-10-35 a indicated on Chain of Custody Log No. 07893 The <br /> W samples were delivered to our laboratory on September 27, 1995 <br /> As you requested, a Hydraulic Conductivity (permeability) test (ASTM D5084-90) <br /> was performed on the three samples. <br /> The results of the 1Iydrauuc Conductivity tests am presented on the attached Table <br /> .+ I, Summary of Hydraulic Conductivity Testing. De-aired tap watrr was the <br /> permeant and the hydraulic gradient mgcd £rum 14.8-23.4. The effective <br /> confining pressure was maintained at 12 pounds per square inch (psi) for mmyles <br /> UW-2-31 and SU-9.30 The effective confining pressure was maintained at 14 <br /> pounds per square inch (psi) for sample SB-14.35. <br /> 4 <br /> F <br /> Z We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project and look <br /> ti forward to providing additional service, as needed, in the future.. <br /> = Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact <br /> C Ol1Y office at Mout convenfence. <br /> a very tly Yo= <br /> sr+ <br /> ANDERSON CONSULTING GROTIP <br /> Paul C. Oswald <br /> Commaroe delve Laboratory SuPwASor - <br /> Paosvrtls GA copies; 1 to California Laboratory Services <br /> 85878-9A31 � <br /> 768 88$3 r <br /> .7$8.3887 <br /> y .r I <br />