Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 of 4 <br /> I'll be honest. elevated levels of residual HCs in the gw won't get you NFA just because your system'can't <br /> get the HCs out....I won't approve'an NFAR with thousands of TPHg or hundreds Benzene, or multiple tens <br /> of 1,2-DCA, TBA, or MtBE....you got to-get these COCs down to MCLs or darn close..... <br /> if SVE alone or in combo with IAS isn't reaching your problem or not adequately reducing your <br /> concentrations or if the system is not cost-effective, or at it's design limits have been met or surpassed, you I <br /> must change horses to continue on this trail to.getting a NFA partner.(that's my Texas talk).. <br /> if you can with this system or with small cost effective changes get your TPHg down to hundreds, Benzene <br /> down below 900, and the Oxys down to low two digit numbers then polish therm off with insitu oxidants... <br /> (numbers are ppb in gw) <br /> you'll need a bench scale test (bst)for anything OTHER.than ambient air injection. Ozone, peroxide, <br /> persulfates, Fentons', etc ALL require a bst before you can enact. "....or get some Calif certified <br /> Geophysicist/chemical engineer to state the addition/injection of an oxidant will NOT produce any harmful <br /> byproducts..(yea, like some Gp/Eng is gonna state and sign that w/o a bst...) <br /> your next step should be to get me a professional conclusion in some report that states you feel the current <br /> RA is not adequate and you recommend "XYZ" now. I'll review and comment on your"technical <br /> justification" and if approved, tell you to submit a revised RAP based on feasibility and cost-effectiveness. <br /> You claim that XYZ will work better and cheaper at this site than "ABC'will any you want to field test it'. I <br /> say ok, tell you to send in the work plan for the wells,.borings, soil collection, etc and you go and get the <br /> data you need.to prove your point and design a system. You then put all this in a revised RAP.and send it <br /> to me. I approve your RAP, put you thru PP (public participation, which may be waived, depending on <br /> Rem action)...you pass-PP and you install system an go online... <br /> that what you had in mind? <br /> From: Eric Muehlberger [m"ailto:EMuehlberger@deltaenv.com] <br /> Seat: Monday,"April 07, 2008 12:15 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: Former Canteen site <br /> Mike, <br /> i <br /> We are pulling together a proposal to conduct'some additional work at the subject site to address <br /> some of your questions/concerns voiced while Mike McCreight and I had lunch with you last <br /> November. I wanted to make sure we are not going on a wild bunny chase.and check in with you <br /> first..My question is do we submit to you for"preapproval" prior to beginning work? <br /> Eric W. Muehlbef-ger, .PG <br /> ,Senior Consultant y <br /> DELTA CONSULTANTS <br /> DIRECT DIAL: 512.342.9441 <br /> Fax Number: 512.990.73 99 <br /> E-iitail address: emuehlberger a deltaeny.com <br /> Toll free:.800.477.7411 <br /> 1rnvw.deltaenv.coni <br /> Member of inogen <br /> www.ina eg net.com <br /> Confidentiality Notice: If you.are not the intended recipient of this email,please delete. <br /> it. Thank you. <br /> . b <br /> 5/8/2008 �. <br />