My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SHAW
>
1500
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545688
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2020 11:47:17 AM
Creation date
5/21/2020 9:42:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545688
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003634
FACILITY_NAME
CANTEEN CORPORATION
STREET_NUMBER
1500
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
SHAW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14326008
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1500 N SHAW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
596
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 2 <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: Eric Muehlberger <br /> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:59 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Cc: twitner@appliedearth.com <br /> Subject: State Water Resources Control Board <br /> Mike, <br /> I received my copy of a letter from the SWRCB this afternoon. We had asked for pre-approval of our 2003 groundwater monitoring in a <br /> letter dated January 24, 2003. They said our pre-approval request was incomplete for the following reasons: <br /> I. A minimum of three competitive bids is required for the proposed scope of work. Ms. Jennifer White added a note: "IfAES-Regulatory <br /> Services, Inc. would like to be pre-approved for the proposed quarterly monitoring costs (which appear reasonable) they would need to <br /> reduce the proposed costs for Project Management, Project Manager at$120 an hour for 60 hours (that amount is much higher than the <br /> Cleanup Fund typically sees for this kind of work)." I guess they are telling me that I can be pre-approved to conduct the monitoring from <br /> Austin if I reduce my Project Management hours and billing rate? Also, I have not obtained 3 bids for several years since the monitoring <br /> phase has not been that complicated and is in fact declining. Do I really need to obtain three bids? <br /> 2. A completed "Cost Pre-Approval Request" form; signed by the claimant or an authorized representative. I do not remember submitting <br /> this in the past, but we can comply with this. However, the form they attached has a space for a claim number, and we have not been assigned <br /> one yet! <br /> 3. A signed copy of the appropriate lead regulatory oversight agency approval letter for the proposed plan and all addenda. That would be <br /> you, and in the past I submitted your email directing us to continue monitoring until otherwise directed. I failed to do that this time, figuring <br /> they had it in the file. I can send another copy, but they may want something more substantial. <br /> Maybe Ms. White is new to the agency and is going by the book? I do not know, but I could sure use some of your guidance here. Thanks, <br /> Mike and I look forward to your reply. <br /> Regards, <br /> Eric W. Muehlberger, PG <br /> Associate <br /> AES-Regulatory Services, Inc. <br /> 2013 Wells Branch Parkway, Suite 206 <br /> 3/6/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.