My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009846
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SHAW
>
1500
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545688
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009846
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2020 3:18:04 PM
Creation date
5/21/2020 9:51:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009846
RECORD_ID
PR0545688
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003634
FACILITY_NAME
CANTEEN CORPORATION
STREET_NUMBER
1500
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
SHAW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14326008
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1500 N SHAW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the asphalt in two locations in the middle of where the tank had <br /> been located, and obtaining soil samples using a backhoe bucket. <br /> The operation was witnessed by San Joaquin Co. EHD personel . <br /> The soil samples were analyzed as required by the waste disposal <br /> firm so that removed spoil could be taken directly to the <br /> disposal site as it was excavated. <br /> After County approval of the workplan, and arrangements had been <br /> made to transport the removed spoil directly to Forward, Inc. <br /> work began on November 5, using a Jim Thorpe Oil JD 690C excava- <br /> tor operated by Rich Thorpe. W. J. Hunter, RG, supervised oper- <br /> ations, which were witnessed by Michael Collins of the County <br /> EHD. Starting at the north end of the site, the asphalt covering <br /> and the clean fill was removed by the excavator bucket and stored <br /> against the south property line using a backhoe operated by Jamie <br /> Thorpe. After removing the clean fill to a depth of about 5-6 <br /> feet, the original removed soil was encountered. That material <br /> was placed directly in a dump truck parked adjacent to the <br /> excavation. The north end was excavated to a depth of about 12 <br /> feet, with dimensions of about 12 feet wide and 20 feet long. <br /> The top 2-3 ' consisted of black adobe loam, very sticky and <br /> plastic. The adobe graded irregularly to a tan to buff clay, <br /> firm but not plastic, with occassional streaks of harder clay <br /> layers. There were no odors or evidence of contamination noted. <br /> Using the excavator bucket, a soil sample was taken from the <br /> bottom center of the excavation, ( 12 ' deep , ) about 5 feet from <br /> the north wall . Using a clean, 2" X 6" brass tube, the geologist <br /> collected a sample from the teeth of the bucket. It was quickly <br /> sealed with teflon tape and plastic end caps, and wrapped with <br /> duct tape. The sample was labeled and placed on ice pending <br /> transport to the laboratory. That sample is identified as <br /> "btm-No_ ( 12 ' ) on Plates VI & VII. <br /> At this point, the truck was full , and while it was transporting <br /> the material to Forward Inc. for disposal , the removed spoil was <br /> placed on the asphalt pending the return of the truck. The <br /> excavator moved to the south end of the excavation, and soil <br /> removal continued. The clean fill was stored in a separate pile <br /> than the underlying spoil , which was placed in the empty truck, <br /> (which had returned from Forward,. ) At this time, the sire of the <br /> excavation was approximately 12 ' wide and 30 ' long, grading from <br /> 12'deep at the north end to about 9-10' at the south. <br /> While removing spoil from a depth of 10-12 , about 20 feet from <br /> the north end , a very strong petroleum odor was noted , and the <br /> removed spoil revealed obvious staining and discoloration. As <br /> digging progressed, the contamination appeared to be strongest on <br /> the east and south wall , and the bottom. The west wall did not <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.