Laserfiche WebLink
�`fvCES�� <br /> Ifor the transfer of organic compounds from the dissolved phase to the vapor phase Spargmg <br /> requires two components in order to control the remediation process Air must be sparged into <br /> the groundwater to provide thorough contact of the au with the impacted groundwater A <br /> vacuum must be applied to the soils above the water table to withdraw the vapor emitted from the <br /> saturated aquifer materials This vacuum system can also serve to remove COCs in the vadose <br /> I zone Treatment of the off-gas is usually required However, the groundwater is treated in-situ <br /> Air sparging is a viable option for implementation at the site <br /> In-Situ Well Aeration <br /> In-situ well aeration is suxular to air sparging in that groundwater is treated by the transfer of <br /> organic compounds from the dissolved-phase to the vapor phase Air is mjected into a double- <br /> screened well, lifting the water in the well and forcing it out the upper screen Simultaneously, <br /> additional water is drawn into the lower screen As the air bubbles rise to the water surface, the <br /> vapors are drawn off and treated by an SVE system This vacuum system can also serve to <br /> remove CDCs in the vadose zone Treatment of the off-gas is usually required Hhowever, the <br /> groundwater is treated m-situ In-situ well aeration is a viable option for the site <br /> i <br /> Enhanced Bioremediation <br /> I • The mjection of air, oxygen, or hydrogen peroxide can be used to support aerobic biodegradation <br /> and enhance natural biological activity that degrades the CDCs These may be introduced as <br /> gases or as a reactive chemical in a liquid or solid matrix form Additional nutrients (e g , <br /> phosphorus and nitrogen) may also be required to increase the natural bioactivity to levels <br /> sufficient to degrade the COCl within a preferred zone or time frame This technology can be <br /> used for both impacted sort and groundwater Systems to deliver the required additives and .4,4v;- <br /> nutrients <br /> ;nutrients typically require high maintenance since the growth of biomass can clog the m?ection Jt <br /> systems Enhanced bioremediation is a viable option for the site ,� e tuk <br /> 4.1 Technology Screening Summary <br />' Three of the fourteen technologies screened were deemed feasible for remediation of both the <br /> impacted soil and groundwater at the site These technologies included In-Situ Air Spargmg, In-Situ <br /> Well Aeration, and Enhanced Bioremediation A comparison of each technology in terms of <br />' effectiveness, implementabihty, and long-term management requirements is presented <br /> Enhanced bioremediation, as an in-situ treatment, appears feasible to meet the remedial objectives at <br />' this site Enhanced bioremediation can be implemented using temporary well points (e g , Geoprobe <br /> or Hydropunch) to mject the required nutrients into the soil and groundwater The nutrients would <br /> be infected along the approximate centerline of the groundwater plume This option would be the <br /> 1 <br /> 9 <br /> 1 <br />