Laserfiche WebLink
13 MTBE concentrations appear to be increasing in monitoring wells MW-3A, 3D, and 1 I and <br /> fluctuating in monitoring wells MW-3 and MW-13 1,2-DCA concentrations have only been <br /> I detected in monitoring well MW-11, located off-site This constituent has not been detected in <br /> wells located in the UST release area or immediately downgradient of the release area and may <br /> not be related to the release at the Canteen Facility site <br /> IConcentrations of dissolved-phase hydrocarbons in the groundwater exceed the CAMCL for <br /> benzene (1 0 ug/l), toluene (150 ug/1), ethylbenzene (700 ug/1), xylenes (1,750 ug/1), MTBE (13 <br /> ug/1), and 1,2-DCA(0 5 ug/1) TPH-G concentrations ranged from<50 to 220,000 ug/1) The <br /> majority of the groundwater impacts are centered on the MW-3 and MW-13 series wells <br /> Concentrations of 1,2-DCA has only been detected in off-site monitoring well MW-11 and may <br /> not be related to the UST release Historical groundwater analytical results are summarized in <br /> Table 3 Graphical presentation of the data is included in Appendix B Isoconcentration maps <br /> showing the horizontal extent of the dissolved-phase hydrocarbons are presented in Appendix C <br /> Accordingto the San Joaquin Count Flood Control District map, no water wells are located <br /> q Y P <br /> within one half mile of the site The Flood Control District water well location map is included as <br /> Figure 7 The groundwater gradient is consistently towards the south based on 18 monitoring <br /> events The closest down gradient water well is located over one mile from the site Available <br /> . records indicate that most water wells are completed below 125 feet due to seasonal water <br /> fluctuations and the lack of sufficient aquifers above that depth <br />' 4.0 REMEDIATON TECHNOLOGIES EVALUATION <br /> One of the objectives of the PAR is to assess various remediation technologies for applicability to <br /> the specific site conditions at the Canteen Facility Based on the site assessment results, <br /> remediation of both soils and groundwater is required Residual soil impacts were identified in the <br /> former UST tank pit excavation area The extent of the groundwater impact is generally on-site <br /> The groundwater plume extends from the former UST tank pit area (MW-13 well series) to dust <br /> downgradient of the MW-3 well series <br /> I The remediation options listed below were evaluated according to their performance, reliability, <br /> and applicability to the site-specific conditions <br /> Excavation <br /> The source of the release was a 10,000-gallon UST, removed in March of 1992 Impacted soils <br /> were excavated to a depth of 19 5 feet and properly transported and disposed of off-site in <br /> November 1992 Approximately 36 cubic yards of soil were transported to Forward Inc Landfill <br /> The former tank hold was backfilled with clean imported fill Further excavation of the site is not <br /> 5 <br /> I <br />