Laserfiche WebLink
v <br /> Soil samples were obtained using a California modified split-spoon sampler containing <br />' three 2-inch by 6-inch brass tubes One of the brass tubes was taken from each interval, the <br /> ends covered with teflon tape, plastic caps, secured with duct tape, labeled, placed in zip lock <br />' bags, and covered with ice prior to delivery to the laboratory using proper chain-of-custody <br /> procedures <br /> The three newly completed monitor wells were surveyed by a California licensed <br />' surveyor in July 1996, and a copy of the survey is included in Appendix A <br />' All augering and sampling equipment were thoroughly washed and cleaned between <br /> monitoring wells The soil cuttings were placed in steel drums and stored at the Canteen facility <br /> pending analytical results for proper disposal <br />' 3.0 SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br />' Results of the soil analyses, which are depicted on Figure 2, presented in Table 1, and <br /> are provided in Appendix B, indicated that all analyses from the borings for monitor wells <br /> MW-3A and MW-11 were below the 1 detection limits Also, all the analyses from <br /> monitor well MW-10 were below the laboratory detection limits with the exception of the 65 to <br /> 66.5 foot interval This sample had a benzene concentration of 11 }cglkg toluene was 2 �,,Ik <br /> total xylenes were 13 /k , and the total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH)-gasoline concentration <br /> Y Fig g <br />' was 10 mg/kg <br />' Analyses for BTEX constituents were by EPA Method 8020 and TPH analyses were by <br /> EPA Method 5030/8015 modified <br /> 4 <br /> 1 <br />