Laserfiche WebLink
impacted site soil and groundwater at the site These technologies <br /> Vapor Extraction, In-Situ hnologies Include In-Situ <br /> Well Aeration, and Enhanced Blaremedlation Air SpargIng, Sall <br /> Air sparging (AS) and soil vapor extraction SV <br /> determine the feasibilityS) a ( E) pilot testhn <br /> g was of these technalogles In addition, soil samples veeredcted at the site to <br /> areas of the site for <br /> physiochemical and microbiological analyses and er collected from select <br /> assessing the feasibility ty of enhanced bioremediation technologies rich scale studies for <br /> $indicated these technologies were feasible for the Im aged The rosults of the AS and SVE <br /> The results of the Enhanced $Ioremediation feasibility p Soil and gr Un at this site <br /> nutrient augmentation were feasible treatment technologies <br /> indicated that both ox <br /> g s for the impacted soil and Ygen and <br /> Remediation goals Include the treatment and/or rec groundwater <br /> sorbed-phase (soil) concentrations to acceptable health-based of dissolved- <br /> treatment system, phase (groundwater) and <br /> Y , technology im Iementation wor based levels A conceptual design of the <br /> guidelines were Included In the C kplan, and <br /> AP report proposed monitoring and reporting <br /> A topographical site location map Is presented an <br /> FigttreS 2 Figure l and a site details map presented on <br /> This RAP has been completed in accordance <br /> Resources Control with technical and cost guidelines from the State Water <br /> z-z <br />