My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010337
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SHAW
>
1500
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545688
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010337
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2020 3:39:54 PM
Creation date
5/21/2020 2:59:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010337
RECORD_ID
PR0545688
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003634
FACILITY_NAME
CANTEEN CORPORATION
STREET_NUMBER
1500
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
SHAW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14326008
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1500 N SHAW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
250
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> The following document describes the history, extent of impact, and prescribed remedial actions for <br /> hydrocarbon concentrations at the Former Canteen Facility located just east of Highway 99, between <br /> Waterloo Road (Highway 88) and Fremont Street (Highway 26) The one-acre property is zoned <br /> for manufacturing and light industrial use, there are no residences in the immediate area It is <br /> located in Section 31, T 2N , R 7E , M B B &M , on a portion of Section 54 Weber Grant, San <br /> Joaquin County, California (Figures 1 and 2) <br /> This Remedial Action Plan (RAP) includes an assessment of the impacts from the UST release, <br /> proposed cleanup levels for groundwater and soils, the results of feasibility testing conducted at the <br /> site, and proposed monitoring and reporting requirements for the recommended remediation <br /> technology The RAP is intended to provide further details and in-depth design of the conceptual <br /> remediation system presented in the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) dated June 11, 2002 Ina letter <br /> dated July 31, 2002, the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department concurred with the <br /> preliminary design as presented in the CAP and gave approval to finalize the design and submit a <br /> RAP for the site <br /> Results of the soil and groundwater sampling conducted during the assessment portion of the project <br /> indicate that the horizontal and vertical extent of the hydrocarbon impact from the underground <br /> storage tank(UST) release has been delineated Concentrations of sorbed-phase (soil)hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations were compared to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Region 9 Preliminary <br /> Remediation Goals (PRGs) The soil samples collected from the south and southeast walls of the <br /> UST excavation at depths between 14 and 19 feet below ground surface (bgs) exceeded the Industrial <br /> PRGs for benzene, toluene, and xylenes The benzene PRG was also exceeded in borings SB-2 and <br /> SB-13D at approximately 46 5 feet bgs A maximum TPH-G concentration of 17,600 mg/kg was <br /> detected in the soil samples (southeast wall of UST excavation @ 19 feet bgs) <br /> Concentrations of dissolved-phase hydrocarbons in the groundwater exceeded the California <br /> Department of Health Services Drinking Water Standard Maximum Contaminant Levels (CAMCLs) <br /> for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, methyl-tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), and <br /> 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) A maximum TPH-G concentration of 220,000 µg/L (MW-13) was <br /> detected in the groundwater samples The majority of the groundwater impacts are centered on the <br /> MW-3 and MW-13 series of wells The 1,2-DCA concentrations have only been detected in off-site <br /> monitoring well MW-11 and may not be related to the UST release <br /> Based on the site assessment results, remediation of both soil and groundwater is required Three <br /> of fourteen remedial technologies screened were deemed feasible for remediation of both the <br /> I-i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.