My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS_PART 2 FILE 1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HOWLAND
>
16777
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009015
>
WORK PLANS_PART 2 FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2020 2:29:55 PM
Creation date
5/26/2020 1:27:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
FileName_PostFix
PART 2 FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0009015
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004094
FACILITY_NAME
J R SIMPLOT (OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL)
STREET_NUMBER
16777
STREET_NAME
HOWLAND
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19818005
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
16777 HOWLAND RD
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Addendum to the Well Installation and <br /> r Hydraulic Testing Report and Additional <br /> f ARCADIS Well Installation Work Plan <br /> Former Occidental Chemical Corporation <br /> Lathrop, California <br /> C). In addition, injection of treated groundwater into the intermediate zone can occur at INJ-11, INJ-12, <br /> INJ-13/EW-03 or INJ-14/EW-04. Injection of treated water into INJ-11 and INJ-12 will increase the <br /> hydraulic gradient towards the extraction wells EW-8A, EW-12A, EW-14A and EW-15A. Injection of <br /> oxygenated treated water into INJ-12 will stimulate in-situ biodegradation of sulfolane, increase <br /> hydraulic gradient and facilitate extraction of sulfolane-affected groundwater at well EW-15A and the <br /> Simplot BSW. Injection into INJ-113/EW-03 and INJ-14/EW-04 at approximately 30 to 50 gpm will <br /> stimulate in-situ biodegradation of sulfolane, and increase the hydraulic gradient towards extraction <br /> wells(Figure 9). From a historical perspective, the footprint of sulfolane contamination in the <br /> intermediate zone has been stable over time, similar to current conditions (Figure 9). Sulfolane was <br /> historically detected in PW05-125 but is currently non-detect. <br /> Deep Zone 050 to 200 ft bgs) <br /> Groundwater is currently extracted from the deep zone from wells EW-02, EW-04A, EW-05, EW-06, <br /> EW-0813, Simplot's PSW, and Lathrop Water District wells to the east, southeast and northeast of the <br /> Site. In past years, the Simplot BSW has reportedly operated on a contingency basis and seasonally <br /> (March through October)to supplement water supply. Several additional extraction wells are proposed <br /> to be screened in the deep zone, including EW-1213, EW-14B, and EW-15B. These wells would be <br /> located within the areas of highest sulfolane concentrations (Figure 10). Extraction rates from each of <br /> the new deep zone wells are expected to be approximately 20 to 30 gpm (Appendix C). In addition, <br /> injection of treated groundwater into the deep zone can occur at INJ-11, INJ-12, or INJ-14/EW-04. <br /> Injection of oxygenated treated water into INJ-11 and INJ-12 will enhance in-situ biodegradation of <br /> sulfolane and increase the hydraulic gradient towards the deep zone extraction wells within the plume. <br /> Injection of treated water into INJ-12 will enhance in-situ biodegradation of sulfolane and increase <br /> hydraulic gradient, facilitating extraction of sulfolane-affected groundwater at well EW-15A and the <br /> Simplot BSW. Injection into INJ-14/EW-04, expected to be approximately 100 gpm,will increase the <br /> hydraulic gradient towards extraction wells from areas outside of the plume(Appendix C). Sulfolane, <br /> EDB and DBCP concentrations in INJ-14/EW-04 have decreased to levels at or below Site cleanup <br /> standards. <br /> From a historical perspective, the footprint of sulfolane contamination in the deep zone appears to be <br /> fairly stable and has decreased slightly over time to reach current conditions(Figure 10). Sulfolane was <br /> historically detected in wells PW03-218, PW05-196, PW08-180, PW10-195, PW11-195, PW13-165, <br /> PW16-216, PW19-196 and PW21-190 but is currently non-detect or below Site screening levels. <br /> Recent sampling of BSW detected up to 570 pg/L sulfolane during a pumping test. The current plume <br /> footprint interpretation shown on Figure 10 and the updated groundwater modeling runs in Appendix C <br /> are consistent with these results. <br /> 2012-09-13 addendum well install work plan_hy test rpt.docx 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.