My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012625
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SONORA
>
110
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545695
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012625
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2020 1:31:17 PM
Creation date
5/27/2020 12:25:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012625
RECORD_ID
PR0545695
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003877
FACILITY_NAME
CITY OF STOCKTON FIRE STATION #2
STREET_NUMBER
110
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
SONORA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13731025
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
110 W SONORA ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
extraction and bioremediation. The affected soil can also be physically contained to prevent <br /> migration of hydrocarbons into ground water. <br /> Excavation and Aboveground Treatment <br /> r1 <br /> Removal of hydrocarbonous soil by excavation is a common remediation method. After <br /> .j excavation, the soil can be hauled offsite and disposed of in an appropriate facility or <br /> treated to reduce hydrocarbon concentrations by a variety of methods including uncontrolled <br /> aeration, controlled vapor extraction: incineration, wet chemical oxidation, or <br /> bioremediation. After treatment,the soil can usually be hauled to a local Class III landfill, <br /> used as roadbase, or mixed with asphalt. Because gasoline hydrocarbons are relatively <br /> volatile, uncontrolled aeration and controlled vapor extraction are the most cost-effective <br /> methods. Uncontrolled aeration is generally the most cost-effective method, but requires <br /> a large surface area and periodic turning of the soil by a backhoe. The method is usually <br /> not practical during winter months. Controlled vapor extraction is somewhat more costly <br /> due to permitting and operation of vapor-extraction and emission control devices, but <br /> requires less room and can generally be accomplished during (lie winter months. Because <br /> of the relative volatility of gasoline hydrocarbons,treatment by bioremediation,incineration, <br /> or wet chemical oxidation is probably not cost effective in comparison to uncontrolled <br /> aeration and controlled vapor extraction. <br /> 1✓.icavation and aboveground treatment is often a cost-effective method for soil remediation. <br /> The applicability of this method at this site is limited, however, because soil with residual <br /> A, PAjOad GeoSyst4gInS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.