Laserfiche WebLink
h� K L E I N F E L D E R <br /> 0 DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS <br /> 6.1 EXCAVATION 013SCRVATIONS <br /> Approximately 5,000 cubic yards of soil and debris was excavated from Site B and about 10,000 <br /> cubic yards froth site C. Groundwater was encountered in both borings at about 6 to 9 feet bgs. <br /> Site B and C excavation had an estimated average depth of twelve feet and ten feet, respectively. <br /> An estimated I percent of debris material was excavated from Site B consisting of plastic, wood <br /> wire, concrete and railroad ties. Approximately 25 percent of the material at Site B was slaked <br /> lime and time material. Discolored soil and an organic odor was noted in the vicinity of the <br /> slaked time. A soil and two groundwater samples were collected in the vicinity of this material. <br /> An estimated 25 percent of material was estimated to be debris from Site C consisting of sheet <br /> metal. concrete. culvert piping". bricks. +vire. and wood. No soil discoloration or odor was noted <br /> from the soil or groundwater I*rom the excavation at Site C. T\.\'o soil samples were analyzed <br /> from within this excavation were collected at depths ranging from 9 to 12 feet bgs. <br /> 6.2 MONITORING \WELL AI3ANDONMENT OBSERVATIONS <br /> 1Cleinfelder obsen+ed the abandonment of three ofsix wells (MW-7. MW-9 and MW-11) used for <br /> monitoring groundwater irrihe vicinity cif the two disposal sites (B and Q. Monitoring wells MW- <br /> S, MW-10 and MW-12 were not ahlc to be located and were presumed destroyed during grading <br /> operations on site. Well abandonment was conducted by drilling out well casing and well materials <br /> Prom surface to the respective total depths of each of the three \yells and subsequently tremmie- <br /> grouted with a neat cement/hentomw slurry to surface grade in accordance with the approved <br /> PHS/CHD permit. <br /> 6.3 ANALYTICAL RESULT'S <br /> The analytical results of the Ih1'CC soil samples collected from the two excavation sites and <br /> submitted for analyses were I-CVI :wed cnul compared to the 1098 llnited States I-:nvironmental <br /> Protection Auency (CPA) Rcgion IX Preliminary Remediation Goals (ERGs) for soil for <br /> residential and Industrial sitcs. R,"idential PRGs were selected for comparison because they :ire <br /> the most conservative. I-lowcver- the site is zoned and proposed for industrial site use. PBGs are <br /> contaminant concentrations in environmental media (i.e. soil, air. water), calculated by the U.S. <br /> 20-3978-03.W.,61201 Y760 I'age IS o1'20 <br /> © 1999.Kleinkider.tic. Septenlher'). 1999 <br />