My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010286
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SONORA
>
110
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545695
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010286
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2020 5:13:45 PM
Creation date
5/27/2020 4:45:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010286
RECORD_ID
PR0545695
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003877
FACILITY_NAME
CITY OF STOCKTON FIRE STATION #2
STREET_NUMBER
110
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
SONORA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13731025
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
110 W SONORA ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-- -"SOMA <br /> Working To Restore Nature <br /> in the evaluation of the significance of water-level changes observed during the later pumping <br /> test. <br /> The analysis of the pumping data from the site yields the following conclusions: <br /> o The water-bearing zone from approximately 48 to 60 feet bsg is heterogeneous, <br /> anisotropic, and unconfined <br /> o The transmissivity of this zone is approximately 0.1 to 0 2 feet/minute and the specific <br /> yield is approximately 1 to 3 percent. <br /> o The production well exhibited negligible non-linear head losses, suggesting a high <br /> ' efficiency and proper design. <br /> o The groundwater gradient at the site is irregular and has shifted in magnitude and <br /> direction. Therefore, calculation of a steady state capture zone is not valid. To evaluate <br /> remediation feasibility, a conservative approach, which greatly underestimates potential <br /> capture zone, was used This approach uses the steepest observed gradient moving away <br /> from the tank area (0.04 in a northeast direction) which yields an estimated limit of the <br /> steady-state capture zone downgradient of well RW-1 of 12 feet for a pumping rate of <br /> ' 3.5 gallons per minute (gpm). It is likely that the gradient direction reversals observed <br /> at the site over four separate monitoring events result in an average annual gradient that <br /> is relatively flat. This would result in a much larger potential capture zone. Longer <br /> ' term static monitoring at the site would be needed to define the capture zone more <br /> precisely. <br /> ' 4.0 SUMMARY OF SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS <br /> 4.1 Extent of Hydrocarbon-Lnpacted Soil <br /> ' The lateral extent of gasoline hydrocarbons in soil is delineated by borings B-6 and B-7 on the <br /> ' west, boring B-5 on the south, boring B-4 on the east, and boring B-15 on the north. The <br /> highest concentrations of residual gasoline hydrocarbons appear to be north and west of tank T3, <br /> ' from approximately 15 feet bsg to the top of the groundwater surface (42 feet bsg). <br /> 38009-88009-8 FRP 9 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.