Laserfiche WebLink
d <br /> for approximately 120 hours This monitoring was conducted to evaluate short term fluctuations <br /> in the shallow aquifer under non-pumping conditions A plot of the depth to water in RW-1 <br /> over the monitoring period is shown on PIate 2 <br /> Background Water Level Monitoring Results <br /> The static monitoring component of the test program was undertaken after the conclusion of the <br /> long term test and consisted of placing a single channel data logger and transducer into RW-1 <br /> for approximately 120 hours after the well had recovered 98% of the prepumping water level <br /> These data which are plotted on Plate 2 show an average water elevation increase of <br /> approximately 1 2 feet over the 5 day monitoring period. However, approximately one foot of ✓ <br /> this increase took place over a single 12 hour period The water level increase noted over the <br /> first several to perhaps as many as 20 hours of monitoring may represent continuing recovery <br /> from pumping <br /> The rising static water elevations after 20 hours may reflect several sources including tidal/nver <br /> stage changes, production well pumping to the area, recharge from nearby Mormon Slough and <br /> natural seasonal recharge trends These sources may be responsible for some of the fluctuations <br /> noted in the well responses during pumping, however any filtering of the data to account for <br /> these affects is well beyond the scope of this report Previous groundwater monitoring data <br /> from four separate events in 1990 shows an irregular shifting gradient which suggests complex <br /> conditions very likely related to the known production well pumping in the area It does not <br /> appear that the background trend has significantly affected the data from the pumping test. <br /> Test Results: Short-Duration Test <br /> The two short-term constant-rate tests showed a slight increase in well productivity (pumping <br /> rate/ft of drawdown) with increasing discharge rate. The specific drawdown s/Q (feet of <br /> drawdown/gpm) is plotted versus the pumping rate (gpm) for the 5 and 2 0 gpm short-term tests <br /> and the 2.5 gpm longer-term test on Figure 1 <br /> The data plotted on Figure 1 were used to evaluate the well performance. The drawdown to a <br /> pumped well consists of two components, the aquifer losses and the well losses The aquifer <br /> Iosses are generally related to laminar flow conditions and vary linearly with the pumping rate <br /> The well losses include head loss which vanes both linearly and non-linearly with well discharge <br /> rate. The linear well losses are generally related to aquifer damage during well construction <br /> The non-linear (non-darty) well losses are related to turbulent flow within the well screen, the <br /> discharge pipe, and the formation. <br /> These two components can be characterized by the following equation <br /> s = AQ + BQP (Equation 1) <br />. where. AQ = linear head loss <br />