Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> CSUS-Multi Campus Regional Center—Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring <br /> January 23,2003 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Summary of December 2002 Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Results(continued) <br /> Groundwater Contamination continued <br /> Maximum Concentration: <br /> Benzene Benzene(µg/1..) 2.9 <br /> Toluene Toluene(µg/L) 2.5 <br /> Ethyl benzene Ethyl benzene(µg/L) 1.3. <br /> Nature of contamination: Xylenes Xylenes(µg/L) 11 <br /> MTBE MTBE(µg/L) 75 ,- <br /> 1,2-DCA <br /> 5 ,- <br /> 1,2-DCA 1,2-DCA(gg/L) 40".,, <br /> TPH-G TPH-G(µg/L) 610✓ <br /> TPH-K TPH-K(µg/L) 540 <br /> A <br /> FIELD OBSERVATIONS <br /> No separate phase petroleum or sheen was noted in the groundwater recovered from the wells. A <br /> moderate petroleum odor was noted in the groundwater recovered from both MW-2 and MW-3. <br /> Groundwater monitoring field forms are attached. <br /> I <br /> i. GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS AND GRADIENT <br /> On December 27, 2002, the depth to groundwater was measured in monitor wells MW-1, MW-2; and <br /> MW-3. Groundwater elevation data is presented in Table 1, below. The average depth to groundwater in <br /> the monitor wells was approximately 39.83 feet below the surveyed well collar measuring points'(the <br /> measuring points are slightly below the ground surface). The average groundwater elevation measured in <br /> the monitoring wells decreased approximately 0.74 feet between September 11, 2002, and December 27, <br /> f 2002. The estimated groundwater gradient for the site on December 27, 2002,was 0A010 ft/ft to the <br /> northeast and is shown in Figure 2, attached. <br /> I Table 1 Groundwater Elevation Data(December.27, 2002) <br /> Well Number TOC Elevation feet Depth to Groundwater feet Groundwater Elevation(feet) <br /> MW-1 17.42 39.87 -22.45 i <br /> MW-2 17.59 39.98 -22.39 <br /> { MW-3 17.16 39.63 -22.47 i <br /> I <br /> All measurements are in feet. <br /> TOC—Top of Casing <br /> TOC Elevation:Referenced to NAVD88 datum from NGS Benchmark HS3999. u <br /> LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> �. <br /> All groundwater samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline, <br /> kerosene, diesel, and motor oil (TPH-G, -K, -D, AND -MO) by EPA Method 8015m, for benzene, <br /> { toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 8020, and for gasoline <br /> } <br /> oxygenates/additives by EPA Method 8260B. The gasoline oxygenates/additives include methyl tertiary- <br /> butyl ether (MTBE), ethanol, tertiary-butanol (TBA), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary-butyl :ether i <br /> (ETBE), tertiary-amyl methyl ether (TAME), 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB or 1,2-DBA), and . 1,2- <br /> dichloroethane (1,2-DCA). Excelchem Environmental Labs of Roseville, California analyzed the <br /> groundwater samples. The laboratory analytical results for the groundwater samples collected from the <br /> a monitor wells on December 27, 2002, are presented in Table 2, on the next page, and in Figure 3, <br /> attached. Historical groundwater monitoring data ate included in Table A, attached. The laboratory <br /> certificates of analyses and chain-of-custody record are also attached. <br /> os <br /> f.a CONDOR <br />