Laserfiche WebLink
CSUS-Multi Campus Regional Center <br /> Site Background <br /> Page 2 <br /> within a 2,000-foot radius of the site. The work flan was approved by Ms. Rebecca Setliff of the <br /> PHS/EHD in a letter dated November 14, 2001 to Mr. Cliff Bailey of CSUS. <br /> The recommended work was conducted in November and December 2001. Findings of the work were <br /> described in the Additional Soil and Groundwater Investigation and Monitor Well Installation Report, <br /> dated January 11, 2002, prepared by Condor. Results of the work indicated that site soil contamination <br /> was fully investigated but that groundwater contamination was not. Groundwater-contamination was <br /> present down to the total depth of the investigation (approximately 81 feet below the ground surface) and <br /> was present at the lateral bounds of the area investigated, particularly to the east, in the direction of the <br /> groundwater gradient indicated by the initial monitoring event. The sensitive receptor survey indicated the <br /> presence of several potential receptors, but no wells within close proximity to the site that had not been <br /> previously destroyed. <br /> The January 11, 2002 report recommended quarterly groundwater monitoring, additional lateral and <br /> vertical groundwater characterization, and soil over-excavation. The soil over-excavation was a suggested <br /> remedial alternative that was most likely to result in rapid mitigation of site contamination. The SJCEHD <br /> Ietter dated April 26, 2002 agreed with the monitoring and additional groundwater investigation portion <br /> of the recommendations, but requested study of the feasibility of at least two remedial options for the site. <br /> On June 28, 2002, a Condor representative was on site to measure water levels and collect water samples <br /> from the three monitor wells. A slight petroleum odor was noted in the field inspection sample collected <br /> from MW-3. The laboratory analytical results indicated that no petroleum hydrocarbon constituents were <br /> detected in the groundwater sample collected from monitor well MW-1. 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2 DCA) <br /> was detected in the groundwater sample collected from monitor well MW-2. Benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene, total xylenes (BTEX), TPH-G, methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), and 1,2-DCA were <br /> detected to the groundwater sample collected from monitor well MW-3 at concentrations consistent with <br /> those detected during the groundwater investigation conducted in December 2001. The groundwater <br /> gradient was calculated using depth to water measurements collected on June 28, 2002 at the three site <br /> monitor wells. The groundwater elevations generally indicated a groundwater gradient to the southeast. <br /> a <br /> s <br /> I <br />