Laserfiche WebLink
Lopez Property March 2014 <br /> 1601 French Camp Turnpike, Stockton <br /> Claim No: 18245 <br /> groundwater will be used as a source of drinking water in the foreseeable future. Other designated <br /> beneficial uses of impacted groundwater are not threatened, and it is highly unlikely that they will <br /> be, considering these factors in the context of the site setting. Remaining petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> constituents are limited and stable, and concentrations are decreasing. Corrective actions have <br /> been implemented and additional corrective actions are not necessary. Any remaining petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon constituents do not pose a significant risk to human health, safety or the environment. <br /> Rationale for Closure under the Policy <br /> • General Criteria: The case meets all eight Policy general criteria. <br /> • Groundwater Specific Criteria: The case meets Policy Criterion 1 by Class 2. The <br /> contaminant plume that exceeds water quality objectives is less than 250 feet in length. <br /> There is no free product. The nearest water supply well or surface water body is greater <br /> than 1,000 feet from the defined plume boundary. The dissolved concentration of benzene <br /> is less than 3,000 micrograms per liter(pg/L) and the dissolved concentration of methyl tert- <br /> butyl ether (MTBE) is less than 1,000 pg/L. <br /> • Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air: The case meets Policy Criterion 2a by Scenario 3b. The <br /> maximum benzene concentration in groundwater is less than 1,000 pg/L. The minimum <br /> depth to groundwater is greater than 10 feet, overlain by soil containing less than 100 <br /> milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of TPH. <br /> • Direct Contact and Outdoor Air Exposure: The case meets Policy Criterion 3a. Maximum <br /> concentrations in soil are less than those in Policy Table 1 for Commercial/Industrial use, <br /> and the concentration limits for a Utility Worker are not exceeded. There are no soil sample <br /> results in the case record for naphthalene. However, the relative concentration of <br /> naphthalene in soil can be conservatively estimated using the published relative <br /> concentrations of naphthalene and benzene in gasoline. Taken from Potter and Simmons <br /> (1998), gasoline mixtures contain approximately 2 percent benzene and 0.25 percent <br /> naphthalene. Therefore, benzene can be used as a surrogate for naphthalene <br /> concentrations with a safety factor of eight. Benzene concentrations from the Site are <br /> below the naphthalene thresholds in Policy Table 1. Therefore, the estimated naphthalene <br /> concentrations meet the thresholds in Table 1 and the Policy criteria for direct contact by a <br /> factor of eight. It is highly unlikely that naphthalene concentrations in the soil, if any, <br /> exceed the threshold. <br /> Recommendation <br /> The Fund concurs with the County that the Responsible Party should conduct rebound monitoring <br /> following the suspension of active remediation to confirm Site conditions meet Policy guidelines. <br /> Kir Larson, P.G. Date -RobertTrommer, C.H.G. Date <br /> KirfLarson, P.G. Date <br /> Engineering Geologist Senior Engineering Geologist <br /> Technical Review Unit Chief, Technical Review Unit <br /> (916) 341-5663 (916) 341-5684 <br /> Page 2 of 13 <br />