My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TURNPIKE
>
1601
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0521845
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2020 4:17:12 PM
Creation date
5/28/2020 4:04:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0521845
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0014838
FACILITY_NAME
LOPEZ PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
1601
STREET_NAME
TURNPIKE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16504013
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1601 TURNPIKE RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
455
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 2 <br /> Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> From: judie kindle [tomballodi@gmail.com] <br /> Sent: Saturday, January'22, 2011 10:32 AM <br /> To: acolavita@advgeoenv.com <br /> Cc: rarjak@clearwire.n t;Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> Subject: Re: Lopez Property Update <br /> Thanks for the update. We are so pleased that we are at this stage. We also received copies of a letter <br /> the County sent to Mom about the status. As pleased as we are with the fact that we are now near the <br /> corrective action stage, we are concerned about the elapsed time this is taking, especially in light of the <br /> fact the State is eager to brin resolution to these sites and Mom worries so much about the site. <br /> As I understand it, from requ,.st to do the test to wanting the corrective action plan submitted is one full <br /> year! I know there are administrative tasks and perhaps a new methodology had to be developed,but <br /> one year? This is how I understand the timing: <br /> . April 2010 County gave conditional approval to conduct the ozone bench-scale test (I don't know <br /> when it was requested) <br /> . October 2010 AGE forwarded test results to County with the recommendation that a corrective action <br /> plan be developed i , <br /> . January 2011 County concurred with the recommendation and directed the corrective action plan be <br /> submitted by April 2011 <br /> The test itself was 20 days Q day injection of ozone followed by a 13 day study of the aftereffects). <br /> We know that the County is responsible for many sites and that AGE has other work. However, we <br /> would ask that to the extent r ossible the elapsed time be reduced to as few days,weeks, and months as <br /> possible to bring resolution at the earliest possible date. <br /> Thanks. <br /> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:17 AM,Alison Colavita<acolavita@a)adv eg oenv.com>wrote: <br /> Hi Judie and Janie-- <br /> I wanted to give you a brie site update'." :"We have approval to prepare'a Corrective Action Plan. This <br /> plan is due to the County in April. We will do our best to submit it before April. Thanks for your time <br /> and I hope all is well. <br /> Ally Colavita <br /> 1/27/2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.