Laserfiche WebLink
Margaret Lagorio [EH] <br /> From: Margaret Lagorio [EH] <br /> Sent: Thursday, April 23,2009 8:37 AM <br /> To: 'judie kindle' <br /> Cc: Vicki McCartney[EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 1601 Turnpike, Stockton <br /> Judie, <br /> According to our records tie tank was installed in 1972. <br /> R. Gould & Sons was owned Dy the same men as Turnpike Associates and they were named as a <br /> responsible party, but it was a corporation that no longer exists. Your mothers attorney <br /> wanted Turnpike Associates named because they were a partnership and the individual <br /> partners could be named ani this has been done. <br /> The appeal information is hat your mothers attorney filed so I'm sure it is also in your <br /> mothers paperwork. She we also sent copies of all the notices of responsiblility. <br /> I 'm glad you were able to alk to Jim Barton. <br /> Please understand that you can't just drop by when you are in town to review the file. <br /> ' You have to set up a time ind date with Diane Martinez as I informed you previously. <br /> Margaret <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: judie kindle [mailto:tomballodi@gmail.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 2 :29 PM <br /> To: Margaret Lagorio [EH] <br /> Subject: Re: 1601 Turnpike Stockton <br /> Just talked to Barton (Wednesday afternoon) . He was very helpful as I continue to <br /> understand the process. He also was very complimentary about you and Vicky--I told him <br /> I'd been pleased with your service as well. He said that you are very good at keeping <br /> contractors moving toward getting the sites cleaned up. <br /> We will be more active thai we have been working with the contractor as well. <br /> The letters you attached t> your e-mail have given me a start and if there are other such <br /> memos, please send them as well. Otherwise the next time I 'm in Stockton I'll come in to <br /> look thru the file. <br /> I will be drafting a Tette to you expressing how frustrating it is to have Mom as the <br /> only responsible party to :ome up to the plate within a program for which neither the Act <br /> nor regulations provide fo assuring all responsible parties participate. There is <br /> nothing the <br /> county or the state can do anything about this, I know. The purpose <br /> of the letter would be jus to have it in the record and perhaps even serve as a basis for <br /> amendments to the Act or r gulations. I would guess that Mom is not the only such case <br /> where there is no equity. <br /> Thanks again. <br /> Judie Kindle <br /> On 4/22/09, judie kindle <tomballodi@gmail.com> wrote: <br /> > Thanks. I've left a message for Barton. Tried to call you but your <br /> > line has been busy for s me time. If I don't reach you, can you call <br /> > me? 916-971-9227. <br /> > I wouldn't want copies oE your directives, work plans, etc. I think <br /> > Mom has all of those in a box. Appeal information, notices of <br /> 1 <br />