Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> INFORMATION SHEET <br /> ORDER NO. 5-01-119 (REVISED) <br /> STOCKTON COGEN COMPANY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> The Stockton Cogen Company(SCC) owns a 49.9 megawatt net sales (nominal 60 megawatt gross <br /> output) cogeneration plant in Stockton. The operator of the facility is Air Products Manufacturing <br /> Corporation. The facility is a coal and petroleum coke fired circulating fluidized bed steam electric <br /> cogeneration plant that generates steam and electric power. The steam and some of the electricity are <br /> supplied to the neighboring Corn Products Corporation facility, and the remaining electricity produced is <br /> sold to Pacific Gas and Electric Company. <br /> The Discharger generates dechlorinated cooling tower blowdown together with other internal low <br /> volume wastes that are discharged from Outfall 001 to North Littlejohns Creek. All other sanitary and <br /> process wastewater generated by this facility is discharged to the City of Stockton Municipal Utilities <br /> System and is not covered by this NPDES permit. <br /> The Discharger requested in their Report of Waste Discharge dated 23 November 1999 an increase in the <br /> maximum allowable discharge flow to 1.3 mgd from the 0.9 mgd in their previous WDRs (Order No. <br /> 95-148). In evaluating such a request the Board must consider anti-degradation pursuant to 40 CFR <br /> 131.12 and SWRCB Resolution No. 68-16. Historical effluent data finds the toxicity of the effluent to <br /> be less than downstream receiving waters and dissolved oxygen to higher than both the receiving water <br /> and applicable Basin Plan water quality objectives. These are considered benefits to the receiving water. <br /> Also, constituents for which the Discharger has permanent or interim effluent limits are not <br /> bioaccumulative nor are they responsible for downstream impairment or 303(d) listing. Based on these <br /> findings the Board finds that the proposed increase in the maximum allowable discharge will have an <br /> insignificant impact on beneficial uses and is therefore acceptable. <br /> The previous Order contained provisions concerning storm water. This Order does not contain such <br /> provisions, and the Discharger must seek coverage under the General Order. The State Water Resources <br /> Control Board adopted Order No. 97-03-DWQ (General Permit No. CAS000001) specifying waste <br /> discharge requirements for discharges of storm water associated with industrial activities, excluding <br /> construction activities, and requiring submittal of a Notice of Intent by industries to be covered under the <br /> permit. <br /> Federal regulations require effluent limitations for all pollutants that are or may be discharged at a level <br /> that will cause or have a reasonable potential to cause, or contribute to an in-stream excursion above <br /> numerical or water quality standard. The Discharger is required to provide information as to whether the <br /> levels of priority pollutants, including CTR and NTR constituents, and constituents for which drinking <br /> water maximum contaminant levels prescribed in the California Code of Regulation, in the discharge <br /> cause or contribute to an in stream excursion above a water quality objective. If the discharge has the <br /> reasonable potential to cause or contribute to an in-stream excursion above a water quality objective, the <br /> Discharger is required to submit information to calculate effluent limitations for those constituents. <br />