Laserfiche WebLink
• s <br /> INFORMATION SHEET <br /> STOCKTON COGENERATION COMPANY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> The Stockton Cogeneration Company(SCC) owns a 49.9 megawatt net sales (nominal 60 megawatt <br /> gross output) cogeneration plant in Stockton. The operator of the facility is Air Products Manufacturing <br /> Corporation. The facility is a coal and petroleum coke fired circulating fluidized bed steam electric <br /> cogeneration plant that generates steam and electric power. The steam and some of the electricity are <br /> supplied to the neighboring Corn Products Corporation facility, and the remaining electricity produced is <br /> sold to Pacific Gas and Electric Company. <br /> The Discharger generates dechlorinated cooling tower blowdown together with other internal low <br /> volume wastes that are discharged from Outfall 001 to North Littlejohns Creek. All other sanitary and <br /> process wastewater generated by this facility is discharged to the City of Stockton Municipal Utilities <br /> System and is not covered by this NPDES permit. <br /> The Discharger requested in their Report of Waste Discharge dated 23 November 1999 an increase in <br /> the maximum allowable discharge flow to 1.3 mgd from the 0.9 mgd in their previous WDRs (Order No. <br /> 95-148). In evaluating such a request the Board must consider anti-degradation pursuant to 40 CFR <br /> 131.12 and SWRCB Resolution No. 68-16. Historical effluent data finds the toxicity of the effluent to <br /> be less than downstream receiving waters and dissolved oxygen to higher than both the receiving water <br /> and applicable Basin Plan water quality objectives. These are considered benefits to the receiving water. <br /> Also, constituents for which the Discharger has permanent or interim effluent limits are not <br /> bioaccumulative nor are they responsible for downstream impairment or 303(d) listing. Based on these <br /> findings the Board finds that the proposed increase in the maximum allowable discharge will have an <br /> insignificant impact on beneficial uses and is therefore acceptable. <br /> The Discharger applies up to 100,000 gallons per day to a 7.4-acre vacant industrial lot and also utilizes <br /> effluent for landscape irrigation on site. The Discharger has previously been granted a waiver of <br /> discharge requirements for land application of non-contact cooling water. This permit contains <br /> requirements that must be met in order for the Discharger to continue to apply effluent to land. <br /> The previous Order contained provisions concerning storm water. This Order does not contain such <br /> provisions, and the Discharger must seek coverage under the General Order. The State Water Resources <br /> Control Board adopted Order No. 97-03-DWQ (General Permit No. CAS000001) specifying waste <br /> discharge requirements for discharges of storm water associated with industrial activities, excluding <br /> construction activities, and requiring submittal of a Notice of Intent by industries to be covered under <br /> the permit. <br /> Federal regulations require effluent limitations for all pollutants that are or may be discharged at a level <br /> that will cause or have a reasonable potential to cause, or contribute to an in-stream excursion above <br /> numerical or water quality standard. The Discharger is required to provide information as to whether <br /> the levels of priority pollutants, including CTR and NTR constituents, and constituents for which <br /> drinking water maximum contaminant levels prescribed in the California Code of Regulation, in the <br /> discharge cause or contribute to an in stream excursion above a water quality objective. If the discharge <br /> has the reasonable potential to cause or contribute to an in-stream excursion above a water quality <br /> objective, the Discharger is required to submit information to calculate effluent limitations for those <br /> constituents. <br />