Laserfiche WebLink
Section 2 0 Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation <br /> Surface Seal—All reasonable attempts will be made to place a neat cement or cement grout <br /> sanitary seal from the ground surface to a minimum depth of 20-feet bgs and extending to the top <br /> of the bentonite transition seal. However, where shallow groundwater occurs above 24-feet bgs, <br /> the well will be constructed to provide the maximum length of sanitary seal and in no case will <br /> the sanitary seal be less than 5-feet deep. <br /> Figures 2 and 3 depict the typical monitoring well completion details anticipated for the site. <br /> Additionally, special attention shall be given to the construction of the monitoring well to <br /> minimize the potential for contamination of any materials used in the installation. <br /> 2.6 WELL DEVELOPMENT <br /> The drilling contractor will develop the wells using a combination of methods. Where <br /> practicable and where formations stability permits, well development by gently swabbing the <br /> well with a surge block will be initiated before the installation of the bentonite transitional seal or <br /> neat cement/cement grout sanitary seal to ensure settling of the filter pack prior to sealing the <br /> annulus. Once the seal has been installed and sets up for no less than 12 hours, further <br /> development by vigorously swabbing the well with a surge block and manual bailing will ensue <br /> and continue until the concentration of suspended solids in the water bailed from the well is <br /> sufficiently low to permit pumping with a portable submersible pump. Accumulated fill shall be <br /> removed from the bottom of the well screen. <br /> Development will continue until the discharge water runs clear and/or field measured turbidity is <br /> 5 n.t.u., or less. During the pumping phase of well development, the pump will be moved up and <br /> down the entire length of well screen, maximizing the removal of accumulated fines. <br /> Water generated from the well during development will be discharged directly to land. <br /> 2.7 WELL DISINFECTION <br /> It has been ECO:LOGIC's experience that the effectiveness of well disinfection procedures vary. <br /> Even when newly installed wells are monitored following initial disinfection it is not uncommon <br /> for coliform to initially decline however, then rebound during subsequent monitoring. This is <br /> likely attributable to the efficiency of the disinfection procedures, which are limited to the <br /> transmission of the disinfectant throughout the borehole, filter pack, and adjacent geologic <br /> materials,which may have been contaminated during well drilling/construction. Additionally, <br /> the introduction of other sources of water and chemicals may influence sensitive water quality <br /> monitoring and generally should be avoided unless absolutely necessary. Furthermore, total <br /> coliform organisms are commonly used as an indicator parameter only, due largely to its non- <br /> conservative transport in the presence of appreciable fine grained sediment and its abundant <br /> presence in the natural environment. As such, the proposed monitoring wells will not be <br /> disinfected unless monitoring results indicate persistently elevated densities of coliform <br /> organisms present over three consecutive quarters of groundwater monitoring. Recommendations <br /> for subsequent disinfection procedures will be presented within the wastewater facility's <br /> quarterly or annual groundwater monitoring report(s), should coliform densities fail to decline <br /> April 2007 City of Ripon Wastewater Treatment Facility <br /> 25 Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation Workplan <br />