My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VIA NICOLO
>
17950
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516772
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2020 12:44:39 PM
Creation date
6/1/2020 12:23:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0516772
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012793
FACILITY_NAME
MUSCO OLIVE LAND APP/TITLE 27
STREET_NUMBER
17950
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VIA NICOLO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
APN
20911032
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17950 W VIA NICOLO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
893
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ADM %41STRATIVE CML LIABILITY COMPLAINT NO.R5-2004-0534 -3- <br /> MUSCO FAMILY OLIVE COMPANY AND THE STUDLEY COMPANY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> TSO VIOLATIONS <br /> 11. This Complaint is based on the Discharger's violations of certain tasks required by the TSO, as <br /> revised, from the date of issuance (25 January 2002) through 31 May 2004. This Complaint does <br /> not consider potential violations of Task 16, which required the Discharger to submit by <br /> 15 August 2002 a report showing that the 84-MG reservoir and tailwater system were fully <br /> constructed and operational and that a liner, adequate to prevent the stored wastewater from <br /> impacting the groundwater, had been installed. Additional technical information is required to <br /> evaluate and determine whether the Discharger achieved compliance with the objective, if not the <br /> letter, of Task 16. Subsequent violations of the WDRs or TSO, if any, in addition to confirmed <br /> violations of Task 16, will be addressed in a future complaint, as appropriate. <br /> 12. The case file documents the following violations of the TSO and the established penalty therein <br /> for each violation: <br /> a. Task 1 requires the Discharger to comply effective 28 January 2002 with all aspects of <br /> Revised Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP)No. 97-037, an order previously issued <br /> pursuant to CWC Section 13267. The penalty for this violation is $2,500 for each day a <br /> report is late or incomplete. On 6 September 2002, the Regional Board adopted WDRs <br /> No. R5-2002-0148, which replaced Revised MRP No. 97-037 with MRP No. R5-2002-0148. <br /> Task 1 does not specifically require compliance with future revisions to Revised MRP <br /> No. 97-037. However, the TSO requires measures be implemented to ensure long-term <br /> compliance with WDRs Order No. 97-037, or any revisions to those WDRs. As WDRs <br /> Order No. R5-2002-0148 requires compliance with MRP No. R5-2002-0148 pursuant to <br /> CWC Section 13267, each day a report required by MRP No. R5-2002-0148 is late or <br /> incomplete is a violation of Task 1. <br /> Task 1 violations are determined as follows: Monthly self-monitoring reports (SMRs) are <br /> due by the first day of the month following the month in which the samples were taken in <br /> accordance with MRP No. 97-037, revised 30 November 2001, and MRP No. R5-2002-0148. <br /> Each day following the due date of late or incomplete SMRs until the next month's SMR due <br /> date is considered a Task 1 violation. <br /> Task 1 was justified due to the Discharger's chronic failure to comply with MRP <br /> requirements. The Discharger's noncompliance since TSO adoption is attributable primarily <br /> to missing data due to inoperable monitoring devices and the Discharger's failure to conduct <br /> daily monitoring on weekends and holidays. Task 1 violations began accruing from 1 March <br /> 2002 through 31 May 2004, the end of the evaluation,period. Pursuant to the TSO, the <br /> maximum penalty for these violations is $2,057,500. <br /> b. Task 3 specifies a time schedule for complying with C&A Order No. 5-00-717, which <br /> required immediate compliance with all aspects of WDRs Order No. 97-037, including flow <br /> and capacity limitations. Task 3 limits the 7-day average flow discharged to land to <br /> 600,000 gpd and the daily maximum flow to 750,000 gpd between 1 February and 6 June <br /> 2002. The SMRs reveal three days in which the 7-day average flow limit was exceeded and <br /> 17 days in which the daily maximum flow limit was exceeded during this period. Pursuant <br /> to the TSO, the maximum penalty for these violations is $50,000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.