Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Ben Hall 0 - 5 - • 1 July 2002 <br /> Figure 1 shows that the largest land application area is directly south of the retention pond, and <br /> connected directly to the retention pond. Figure 1 also shows that SW-3 is immediately east of <br /> the retention pond. Therefore, the SWPPP statement regarding the location of SW-3 needs to be <br /> explained. In addition, the SWPPP needs to provide a more detailed map(s)with a convenient <br /> scale that shows the drainage patterns and fate of runoff in each land application area. <br /> 13. Page 26, Annual Reporting Requirements <br /> The Annual Report should be submitted in both electronic and paper formats and must contain <br /> the following: <br /> a. An Executive Summary discussing the effectiveness of the SWPPP in reducing storm <br /> water pollution using Best Available Technology Economically Achievable (BAT) and <br /> Best Conventional Pollutant Control Technology(BCT); <br /> b. Summary of activities conducted by Musco; <br /> C. Identification of BMPs and a discussion of their effectiveness at reducing storm water <br /> runoff pollutants; <br /> d. Summary of monitoring data, including the identification of water quality improvements <br /> or degradation, and recommendations for improvements to the SWPPP (including <br /> proposed BMPs)based on the monitoring results. All receiving water monitoring data <br /> shall be compared to applicable water quality standards in the Basin Plan, the California <br /> Toxics Rule (CTR), and California Title 22 (Title 22); <br /> e. An assessment of each component of the SWPPP. The assessment shall include the <br /> identification of receiving water quality improvements or degradation and a comparison <br /> with applicable water quality standards. The lowest applicable standard from the Basin <br /> Plan, CTR, and Title 22 shall be used for comparison. When the data indicate that <br /> discharges are causing or contributing to exceedances of applicable receiving water <br /> quality standards, a discussion of how Musco plans to get into compliance shall be <br /> included; <br /> f. Identification and analysis of any long-term trends in storm water or receiving water <br /> quality. For a long-term trend analysis to be valid, sufficient data must be available. <br /> Musco must conduct an analysis for constituents that have sufficient data; <br /> g. An estimation of total annual pollutant loads due to storm water runoff; and <br /> h. Recommendations to improve the monitoring program, BMPs, Performance Standards, <br /> and the S WMP to address potential receiving water quality exceedances and potential <br /> pollutant sources, and to meet the BAT/BCT standard. <br />