My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VIA NICOLO
>
17950
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516772
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2020 12:44:39 PM
Creation date
6/1/2020 12:23:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0516772
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012793
FACILITY_NAME
MUSCO OLIVE LAND APP/TITLE 27
STREET_NUMBER
17950
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VIA NICOLO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
APN
20911032
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17950 W VIA NICOLO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
893
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i • <br /> Mr. Ben Hall - 2 - 7 July 2003 <br /> Musco Family Olive Company <br /> The Plan indicates generally that waste olives, olive pits, olive stems, screened solids, packaging waste, <br /> used oil, solvents, and miscellaneous trash are temporarily stored in waste containers and hauled offsite <br /> to either a recycling facility or a landfill,but offers no specifics. A 21 April 2003 Notice of Violation <br /> issued as a result of a 12 March 2003 Regional Board staff inspection of the facility cited housekeeping <br /> deficiencies in the solid waste staging area (e.g., spillage of canning brine from damaged cans) that may <br /> release pollutants in storm water runoff. The Plan should address how solid waste will be stored in a <br /> manner that precludes leakage and spillage of liquid waste. <br /> The Plan indicates that 20 cubic yards of sludge from the 1-million gallon wastewater settling pond and <br /> 450 tons of olive leaves are applied annually to land application areas. According to information <br /> obtained during the 13 March inspection, past discharges of olive leaves were conducted in concentrated <br /> fashion (i.e: to the same area for several consecutive years). This practice may or may not have resulted <br /> in excessive nitrogen loading and groundwater degradation in the area. The Report does not provide <br /> information indicating whether this past disposal practice overloaded the soil profile with nitrogen or use <br /> the data in any way to address the demonstration requirement. <br /> The Plan's Appendix A consists of a copy of the 21 January 2003 Sludge Management Report(Report) <br /> requesting Regional Board authorization to apply olive leaves and pond sludge to land without <br /> increasing the WDRs nitrogen loading limits. An earlier version of the Report, dated 25 November <br /> 2002, described the proposed discharge of leaves and sludge as follows: disk leaves into about five to ten <br /> acres of fields on a rotating basis; dredge the 1-million gallon pond annually, temporarily stockpile pond <br /> silt while dredging the pond, spread wet pond silt over a 0.25- to 0.5-acre field, allow the pond silt to <br /> dry, disk the pond silt into the soil, and rotate the pond silt application area among the fields adjacent to <br /> the pond. The earlier version of the Report proposed not to discharge leaves and pond sludge to areas <br /> with available nitrogen above 175 lbs/acre, as determined by the sum of nitrate and ammonia from the <br /> annual soil sampling required in the Monitoring and Reporting Program accompanying the WDRs. <br /> Regional Board letter dated 4 December 2002 found this version of the Report unconvincing and <br /> prohibited future land application of olive leaves due to the potential for excessive nitrogen loading. <br /> Nevertheless, the Report lacks application procedures and one must assume that portions of the previous <br /> Report are intended to apply in this regard. If the previous Report still represents the proposed land <br /> application procedures for leaves and sludge, the Plan should include a description of these procedures. <br /> If not, it should specify updated application procedures. <br /> The Report includes a table characterizing the olive leaves and pond sludge. The chloride content of the <br /> pond sludge appears to be similar to the soil in many of the land application areas. The Report indicates <br /> olive leaves and pond sludge can be applied to land application areas without exceeding existing <br /> nitrogen loading limits, as the nitrogen availability to plants is less than the total nitrogen in the soil. <br /> The Report proposes to use a nitrogen factor of 40 percent of total nitrogen initially, sample the soil for <br /> ammonia and nitrate before and after each application, and use this data to evaluate the appropriateness <br /> of the nitrogen factor and the land application practice. The Plan does not specify that leaves and sludge <br /> would not be applied to soils that already contain nitrate and ammonia concentrations exceeding <br /> 175 lbs/acre or that would cause such an exceedance, as the earlier version of the Report specified. <br /> The Plan does not contain sufficient information for us to evaluate whether the proposed discharge of <br /> olive leaves and pond sludge will cause or contribute to violations of groundwater limitations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.