My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VIA NICOLO
>
17950
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516772
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2020 12:44:39 PM
Creation date
6/1/2020 12:23:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0516772
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012793
FACILITY_NAME
MUSCO OLIVE LAND APP/TITLE 27
STREET_NUMBER
17950
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VIA NICOLO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
APN
20911032
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17950 W VIA NICOLO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
893
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER NO.R5-2002-0148 - 19- <br /> MUSCO FAMILY OLIVE COMPANY AND THE STUDLEY COMPANY <br /> WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND LAND DISPOSAL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> 88. In regards to decomposable waste, the Discharger has not, among other things, demonstrated the <br /> appropriate loading of the LTU and operating controls as required to assure no organic constituents <br /> leach below the treatment depth,which is also not justified. However, as a general guide, <br /> Pollution Abatement recommends an LTU for food-processing wastewater not exceed a loading of <br /> BODS of 100 lbs/acre-day to prevent development of nuisance odor conditions. The RWD <br /> describes the projected BOD average loading rate as approximately 70 lbs/acre-day; however, <br /> recent monitoring reports show that the discharge contains much higher BOD loading rates which <br /> will not comply with the recommendation in Pollution Abatement. <br /> 89. The Discharger has not proposed a project that will assure no degradation for constituents that <br /> already exceed water quality objectives and therefore is inconsistent with the Basin Plan and <br /> cannot be exempted from Title 27 standards. <br /> OTHER REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS <br /> 90. Section 13267(b) of California Water Code provides that: "In conducting an investigation specified <br /> in subdivision(a), the regional board may require that any person who has discharged, discharges, <br /> or is suspected of having discharged or discharging, or who proposes to discharge waste within its <br /> region, or any citizen or domiciliary, or political agency or entity of this state who has discharged, <br /> discharges, or is suspected of having discharged or discharging, or who proposes to discharge, <br /> waste outside of its region that could affect the quality of waters within its region shall furnish, <br /> under penalty of perjury, technical or monitoring program reports which the regional board <br /> requires. The burden, including costs, of these reports shall bear a reasonable relationship to the <br /> need for the report and the benefits to be obtained from the reports. In requiring those reports, the <br /> regional board shall provide the person with a written explanation with regard to the need for the <br /> reports, and shall identify the evidence that supports requiring that person to provide the reports." <br /> The technical reports required by this Order and the attached"Monitoring and Reporting Program <br /> No. R5-2002-0148" are necessary to assure compliance with these waste discharge requirements. <br /> The Discharger operates the facility that discharges the waste subject to this Order. <br /> 91. State regulations pertaining to water quality monitoring for waste management units are found in <br /> Title 27. These regulations prescribe procedures for detecting and characterizing the impact of <br /> waste constituents on groundwater. While the facility has been found exempt from Title 27,the <br /> data analysis methods of Title 27 are appropriate for determining whether the discharge complies <br /> with the terms for protection of groundwater specified in this Order. <br /> 92. The California Department of Water Resources sets standards for the construction and destruction <br /> of groundwater wells (hereafter DWR Well Standards), as described in California Well Standards <br /> Bulletin 74-90 (June 1991) and Water Well Standards: State of California Bulletin 94-81 <br /> (December 1981). These standards, and any more stringent standards adopted by the State or <br /> County pursuant to CWC section 13801, apply to all monitoring wells. <br /> 93. On 28 February 1997, the Regional Board adopted a Negative Declaration for this project. The <br /> negative declaration described a discharge of 500,000 gpd to 200 acres of cropland, and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.