My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VIA NICOLO
>
17950
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516772
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2020 12:44:39 PM
Creation date
6/1/2020 12:23:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0516772
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012793
FACILITY_NAME
MUSCO OLIVE LAND APP/TITLE 27
STREET_NUMBER
17950
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VIA NICOLO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
APN
20911032
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17950 W VIA NICOLO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
893
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORDER NO. R5-2002-0148 - 6 - <br /> INFORMATION <br /> 6 - <br /> INFORMATION SHEET <br /> MUSCO FAMILY OLIVE COMPANY AND THE STUDLEY COMPANY <br /> WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND LAND DISPOSAL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> do not hinder crop growth. Because the DIS loading rate exceeds the crop uptake rate,it is anticipated that <br /> leaching of DIS will result in interim soil attenuation of the DIS and eventual groundwater degradation with <br /> continued application. This application procedure is not sustainable with nondegradable constituents. <br /> Loading rates must be balanced with uptake rates to protect groundwater quality, and therefore the 1,500 <br /> mg/l effluent limit for TDS is necessary. <br /> The Discharger states the BOD limits presented in the WDRs are overly restrictive and that higher loading <br /> rates have been employed at land application areas. Staff disagree that higher loading rates than published in <br /> the tentative WDRs would acceptable based on the Discharger's plan to limit treatment of BOD by <br /> mechanical treatment equipment and instead rely upon land treatment of BOD constituents. Land treatment <br /> is an effective treatment mechanism,however, overloading the land can result in generation of odors. The <br /> discharge has resulted in the generation of nuisance odors at the facility and staff has received numerous <br /> complaints,the most recent on 29 August 2002. <br /> Staff believes the appropriate BOD value that should be selected from Pollution Abatement is 100 <br /> lbs/acre-day. It is noted that the limit published in Pollution Abatement is for the summer season when <br /> conditions for land application are favorable. The Discharger is likely to discharge wastewater all year <br /> round,when conditions are not optimum. This limit published in the tentative WDRs should be protective <br /> of groundwater quality and crop health and should not generate nuisance odor conditions. This position is <br /> based on the staff s experience and the loading rate guidance presented in Small and Decentralized <br /> Wastewater Management Systems (Crites and Tchobanoglous, 1998) which states that loading rates for <br /> BOD often exceed 100 lb/acre day and occasionally exceed 3001b/acre•day; odor problems are avoided by <br /> providing adequate drying times between wastewater applications; and loading rates beyond 450 <br /> lb/acre-day of BOD should generally be avoided unless special management practices are used. Because <br /> of the close proximity of residential areas and the limited land area available for wastewater application, <br /> BOD loading rates that require special precautions are not appropriate in this case. <br /> Pollution Abatement also states if the BOD loading is too great, the soil will become anaerobic and the <br /> crop and treatment process will fail, but that higher loading rates are possible if the site is irrigated for only <br /> a few weeks each year and is well maintained. The Discharger's facility operates 365 days a year, so the <br /> application areas will not have the opportunity to rest. Because of the limited land area available there are <br /> no alternative application areas to discharge the water to if a system upset occurs." <br /> The Discharger is required to continue characterizing groundwater quality and to begin characterizing the <br /> quality of the percolate below the land treatment units. Percolate samples will be collected by pan lysimeters <br /> both in areas of land application and areas outside the land application limits. Groundwater monitoring wells <br /> will monitor the first saturated interval;percolate samples will be monitored by pan lysimeters installed at a <br /> depth of five feet. If groundwater or percolate quality is degraded,the Discharger must take steps such as <br /> reducing loading or improving cropping to protect groundwater quality. <br /> NUISANCE ODOR CONDITIONS <br /> The Regional Board has received numerous odor complaints regarding the land application areas. An <br /> adjacent landowner described the nuisance odor conditions at the 6 June 2002 Regional Board meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.