Laserfiche WebLink
ORDER NO.R5-2002-0148 <br /> • • _ 19 - <br /> INFORMATION SHEET <br /> MUSCO FAMILY OLIVE COMPANY AND THE STUDLEY COMPANY <br /> WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND LAND DISPOSAL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Based on long-standing practice, the agronomic nitrogen loading rate for a given crop is based on the <br /> rates presented in the most recent edition of the Western Fertilizer Handbook unless the Discharger <br /> demonstrates that another rate is technically justified. <br /> Staff has taken a conservative approach in requiring the Discharger to apply nitrogen at agronomic rates. <br /> This limit will apply until the Discharger can provide additional site-specific testing data to support their <br /> denitrification assumptions. <br /> Effluent Limitation C.3 <br /> Loading limits for BOD are needed because excessive loading can deplete soil oxygen and cause <br /> anaerobic conditions. Anaerobic degradation of organic matter can cause severe nuisance odors and <br /> promote incomplete biodegradation, thereby allowing dissolved organic material to percolate through <br /> the unsaturated zone into groundwater. Anaerobic decomposition of organic wastes also creates organic <br /> acids that decrease soil pH. A low pH environment can cause excessive leaching of metals in the soil <br /> into underlying groundwater. <br /> This Discharge Specification prescribes a maximum BOD loading of 300 lbs/acre on any one day, and <br /> 100 lbs/acre/day as a 7-day(weekly) average. The weekly average loading limit of 100 lbs/acre/day is <br /> based on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Publication (USEPA) guidelines provided in Pollution <br /> Abatement in the Fruit and Vegetable Industry— Wastewater Treatment (USEPA 625/3-77-0007) <br /> (hereafter Pollution Abatement). Although the RWD states that the yearly average BOD loading will be <br /> less than 701b/ac/day, a review of the most recent self-monitoring report(May 2002) shows that the <br /> Discharger may not be able to meet the daily or weekly limitations. The Discharger has already <br /> proposed to install aerators in its ponds; this step may be all that is necessary to meet the BOD effluent <br /> limitation. If not then the Discharger will need to take other steps to improve its treatment system. It is <br /> not appropriate to relax the BOD loading rate as staff are still receiving odor complaints. <br /> Land Application Area Specification D.19 <br /> Land Application Area Specification D.15 requires that effect wastewater application on the soil shall <br /> not exceed the buffering capacity of the soil profile. The Discharger has described the disassociation of <br /> the bicarbonate ion under certain soil pH conditions but has failed to describe the pH at which the <br /> disassociation is anticipated to occur. Pollution Abatement recommends a wastewater pH range of 6.4 <br /> to 8.4 for irrigation and Effluent Limitation CA requires wastewater discharged to the land application <br /> areas to not have a pH of less than 6.5 or greater than 8.5. This limitation alone cannot ensure that soil <br /> pH conditions will be optimal for land treatment and preventing leaching of metals, so Land Application <br /> Area Specification D.19 requires that the discharge not exceed the soil pH buffering capacity. <br /> Land Application Area Specification D.20 <br /> This specification is needed because wastewater application near the property boundary has resulted in <br /> nuisance odors for residents. The Discharger's Odor Minimization Report described elimination of <br /> standing water in the irrigation checks. Because the soil permeability is so low, staff believe any <br /> application of wastewater at the irrigation checks will result in standing water. To prevent anaerobic <br /> conditions and associated odor problems in the treatment and storage ponds, this Order also requires the <br />