My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VIA NICOLO
>
17950
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516772
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2020 12:44:39 PM
Creation date
6/1/2020 12:23:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0516772
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012793
FACILITY_NAME
MUSCO OLIVE LAND APP/TITLE 27
STREET_NUMBER
17950
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VIA NICOLO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
APN
20911032
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17950 W VIA NICOLO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
893
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STAFF REPORT 10 <br /> MUSCO FAMILY OLIVE COMPANY AND THE STUDLEY COMPANY <br /> CONSIDERATION OF WDRS AND A C&A ORDER <br /> 6 September 2002 Regional Board Agenda <br /> Well Date Units TDS Chloride Sodium <br /> MW-1 4/10/02 mg/L 690 67 240 <br /> MW-1 6/24/02 mg/L 770 110 250 <br /> Average -- mg/L 730 88.5 245 <br /> St. Dev. mg/L 57 30 7 <br /> Background -- mg/L 850 150 260 <br /> Confined Aquifer <br /> MW-8 4/10/02 mg/L 1,300 130 280 <br /> MW-8 6/24/02 mg/L 1,300 270 290 <br /> Average -- mg/L 1,300 200 285 <br /> St. Dev. mg/L 0 99 7 <br /> Background mg/L 1,300 400 300 <br /> Alternative No. 4—Use of Regional Wells <br /> The 7 August 2002 Revised Background Water Quality Preliminary Evaluation Report described <br /> problems with the use of the onsite monitoring wells, and instead proposes the use of regional <br /> domestic/agricultural/industrial wells to determine the background groundwater quality. Staff <br /> disagree with a number of the conclusions in the report and consider a number of the conclusions <br /> unsupported based on the technical information presented in the reports. For example: <br /> • Kleinfelder recommends use of off-site wells to establish background groundwater quality. <br /> Some data on off-site wells was presented in the RWD and is presented in the Tentative <br /> WDRs. The use of the wells is questionable because screened (perforated) intervals are <br /> unknown in most cases, the wells are not in close proximity to the facility (over 9,000 feet in <br /> one case, and the closest being approximately 800 feet), no information on the potential for <br /> any of the wells to have been individually contaminated is available, and the data quality for <br /> the little data that is available is unknown. <br /> • Staff do not agree with the unsubstantiated assumption that off-site wells are screened in <br /> shallow aquifers. There is nothing to base this assumption on, and in fact there is reason to <br /> consider it in error. Agricultural and industrial wells are rarely screened only in shallow <br /> zones because a reliable water source is important to their business operation. Fluctuating <br /> groundwater elevations and/or drawdown in pumping wells could dewater wells and stop <br /> irrigation or business operations if wells were of limited depth. <br /> • Kleinfelder implies that the onsite geology is heterogeneous and that more interpretation is <br /> necessary to fully understand the geology and the resulting placement of the monitoring <br /> wells. Staff agree. However, Kleinfelder does not address the fact that the geology in the <br /> surrounding area is also assumed to be heterogeneous, so that the use of wells from a large <br /> area around the facility is not appropriate because they are not expected to accurately <br /> describe the site conditions. <br /> Alternative No. 5 —Use of the Discharger's On-Site Production Well <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.