Laserfiche WebLink
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER NO. - 17- <br /> MUSCO FAMILY OLIVE COMPANY AND THE STUDLEY COMPANY <br /> WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND LAND DISPOSAL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Where background water quality is unaffected by other discharges and greater than water quality <br /> objectives, the background water quality governs. <br /> 81. The general concentrations of key waste constituents in the effluent, storage pond, and in <br /> wastewater applied to land compare with groundwater and water quality objectives as follows: <br /> 1-million On-Site <br /> ag llon Supply Well Background <br /> settling pond (Average) Groundwater' Objectives <br /> DIS 2,718 NM' NM NA' <br /> Chloride 415 334 601 106 <br /> Sodium 739 372 597 103 <br /> TDS 4,737 1,513 2,047 450 <br /> Total Nitrogen 61' 4.4 6° 10 <br /> BOD 3,040 NM NM 0 <br /> NM denotes Not Measured <br /> : NA denotes Not Applicable <br /> ' All nitrogen was present as TKN,nitrate no detected in the samples. <br /> ° Reported as the average sum of NO3 as N and total Kjeldahl nitrogen. <br /> Background quality defined by the average concentrations plus two standard deviations of samples from <br /> the onsite supply well. <br /> 82. The discharge is nonhazardous,but exhibits characteristics of"designated waste," as the <br /> concentrations of some waste constituents when treated, stored, and applied to land have potential <br /> for causing exceedances of water quality objectives or adversely affecting beneficial uses. The <br /> discharge contains decomposable waste constituents (e.g., organic carbon and nutrient <br /> compounds) and inorganic dissolved solids in concentrations that are greater than water quality <br /> objectives when released from any of these structures or from what is applied to land. <br /> 83. The discharge must be categorized as designated waste because of these constituents and subjected <br /> to the full containment provisions of Title 27 unless it can be demonstrated that constituents of <br /> concern, after release, are effectively and consistently removed by attenuation in the soil profile <br /> and the discharge fully compliant with the Basin Plan. For constituents that may infiltrate from <br /> inverts of ponds, this means a demonstration of the effectiveness of liners in containing the <br /> constituent, a scientific demonstration of attenuation within the soil profile beneath lined and <br /> unlined ponds for released waste constituents, and technical evidence that groundwater will not be <br /> degraded by the constituents. For waste applied to the land application area, it means a <br /> demonstration that controlled land treatment removes waste decomposable constituents within the <br /> LTU and, for those not totally decomposable, passes through concentrations that will cause no <br /> degradation of groundwater. Given the applicability of Title 27, some of its definitions and terms <br /> are used herein. <br /> 84. The waste that is discharged to ponds and land contains TDS and sodium well in excess of <br /> governing background quality and is not effectively removed by the LTU. The discharger has <br /> made no demonstration that the LTU can achieve salt removal by land treatment,but proposes use <br /> of crops for this purpose and has provided theoretical projections of crop uptake of salt. TDS can <br /> C:.W I.%M%W M,,kq'W U W R6&. <br />