Laserfiche WebLink
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER NO. -2 7- <br /> MUSCO FAMILY OLIVE COMPANY AND THE STUDLEY COMPANY <br /> WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND LAND DISPOSAL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> operations to comply with the terms and conditions of this order and how to make field <br /> adjustments, as necessary, to preclude nuisance conditions (e.g., standing water, runoff <br /> from landscaped areas, and nuisance odors from ponded wastewater). It shall also include <br /> a nuisance condition troubleshooting flowchart and a description of notification <br /> requirements if bypass occurs. Operating personnel shall keep a copy of the O&M Plan at <br /> the facility for reference. Key operating personnel shall be familiar with its contents. <br /> f By 1 February 2003, the Discharger shall submit a technical report describing the waste <br /> assimilative capacity of the LTUs (land application areas). The report shall contain the <br /> information described in Findings No. 72 through 74. <br /> g. By 1 March 2003, the Discharger shall submit a Solid Waste Management Plan that <br /> describes the sources, storage, treatment, and disposal of solid waste (including olive pits) <br /> generated by the processing facility. <br /> h. By 1 May 2003, the Discharger shall submit a Groundwater Well and Lysimeter <br /> Installation report. The report shall be consistent with, and include the items listed, in the <br /> second section of Attachment D. The report shall describe the installation and <br /> development of the new monitoring wells and lysimeters, and explain any deviation from <br /> the approved workplan. <br /> i. By 1 June 2003, the Discharger shall submit a report showing that it has constructed the <br /> additional domestic wastewater leachlines and seepage pits as described in the 29 May <br /> 2002 Revised Report, Domestic Wastewater System. <br /> j. By 6 September 2004, the Discharger shall submit a Background Groundwater Quality <br /> and Percolate Quality Report. For each groundwater monitoring parameter/constituent <br /> identified in the MRP, the report shall present a summary of monitoring data, a calculation <br /> of the concentration in background monitoring wells and lysimeters, and a comparison of <br /> background groundwater quality to that in wells and lysimeters used to monitor all land <br /> application areas. Determination of background quality shall be made using the methods <br /> described in Title 27, Section 20415(e)(10), and shall be based on data from at least four <br /> consecutive quarterly(or more frequent) groundwater monitoring events. For each <br /> monitoring parameter/constituent, the report shall compare measured concentrations for <br /> compliance monitoring wells and lysimeters with the calculated background <br /> concentration. The report shall contain proposed background groundwater limitations for <br /> TDS, nitrogen, sodium, and chloride. Background values shall be based on site-specific <br /> data. <br /> If the Background Groundwater Quality and Percolate Quality Report shows that the <br /> wastewater discharge has impacted, or is likely to impact groundwater or percolate quality, <br /> then within 90-days of request by the Executive Officer, the Discharger shall submit a <br /> Groundwater Mitigation Plan which shall evaluate contaminant control alternatives, <br /> describe a preferred alternative, and proposed a timeline to meet the Groundwater <br /> Limitations of this Order. The selected contaminant control alternative must comply with <br /> State Water Resources Control Board Resolutiorr No. 68-16 and be consistent with the <br /> C.WM WN'eVy91m\WIlP.P6due <br />