Laserfiche WebLink
INFORMATION SHEET • • - 12 - <br /> MUSCO FAMILY OLIVE COMPANY AND THE STUDLEY COMPANY <br /> WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND LAND DISPOSAL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Based on the above analysis, staff have proposed an interim background concentrations for TDS (2,047 <br /> mg/1), sodium (597 mg/1), chloride(601 mg/1), and nitrate-N(6 mg/1). The Discharger is required to <br /> install and monitor additional groundwater monitoring wells onsite, and within two years to propose final <br /> background concentrations. To protect groundwater quality, the WDRs contain effluent limitations that <br /> match the background water quality. Musco is currently discharging waste at a higher concentration that <br /> the TDS and sodium effluent limitations. Therefore, the Board is asked to consider a companion Cleanup <br /> and Abatement Order. The C&A provides a time schedule for Musco to reduce the TDS and sodium in <br /> its effluent. Musco must meet the effluent limitations within two years. Staff expect that the final <br /> background water quality values, and hence the final effluent limitations, will be less than the interim <br /> values. Therefore, once the final background water quality study is completed, it is expected that Musco <br /> will need to further reduce the salt in its effluent beyond what is currently required by the C&A. <br /> These WDRs require continued groundwater monitoring to fully evaluate the impacts of the Discharger's <br /> past and future disposal practices. However, it is not appropriate to follow the Discharger's <br /> recommendation to conduct a year of monitoring to determine if there are groundwater impacts, and then <br /> design effluent limits based on the groundwater data. In the last year, the Discharger has substantially <br /> increased its wastewater flow and strength, and has begun applying wastewater to a larger area. These <br /> recent changes may not yet be reflected in the groundwater quality. In addition, the RWD clearly shows <br /> that the Discharger intends to apply significantly more salt than will be taken up by the crops; therefore, <br /> these WDRs contain limits to prevent impacts to the underlying groundwater. <br /> Shallow soil samples were collected in the land application areas in November 1999 and April 2001 as <br /> part of the 6 April 2001 Soil Salinity Assessment required by C&A Order No. 5-00-717. The samples <br /> were collected to evaluate the wastewater application impact to soil quality. Analysis indicted that <br /> 22-percent of samples collected in the Field 55 East and Field 55 West (55 acres total)may be impacted <br /> by the wastewater application and 28-percent of the samples collected in Field 95 (95 acres) may be <br /> impacted. The report stated that the high concentration of sodium in the wastewater has the potential to <br /> reduce the already low permeability of the soil permeability. Pan lysimeters are required to allow <br /> measurement of percolate quality. If percolate quality is worse than background groundwater quality, <br /> additional source control or better cropping will be required. <br /> APPLICABILITY OF WATER RECLAMATION REQUIREMENTS <br /> Musco has requested that the Regional Board should consider Musco's discharge under the"Water <br /> Recycling Law", beginning with Section 13500 of the Water Code. This request was contained in the <br /> Discharger's 8 August 2002 Comments to the Tentative Waste Discharge Requirements. Musco believes <br /> that its wastewater should be declared`reclaimed water" and as such, water reclamation requirements,not <br /> waste discharge requirements, should be issued. Musco further states "a Regional Board may not deny <br /> issuance of water reclamation requirements to a project which violates only a salinity standard in a basin <br /> plan." Staff have considered this issue and have consulted with the State Board Office of Chief Counsel. <br /> It is our understanding that it is not appropriate to regulate Musco's discharge under the Water Recycling <br /> Law and that the most appropriate vehicle for regulation is these waste discharge requirements. <br /> Although not expressly described in the this section of the California Water Code, "recycled water" <br /> typically applies to domestic wastewater which is treated to an extent that it can be beneficially reused, <br />