My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VIA NICOLO
>
17950
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516772
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2020 12:44:39 PM
Creation date
6/1/2020 12:23:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0516772
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012793
FACILITY_NAME
MUSCO OLIVE LAND APP/TITLE 27
STREET_NUMBER
17950
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VIA NICOLO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
APN
20911032
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17950 W VIA NICOLO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
893
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INFORMATION SHEET • • - 14 - <br /> MUSCO FAMILY OLIVE COMPANY AND THE STUDLEY COMPANY <br /> WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND LAND DISPOSAL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Discharger has requested permission to apply wastewater during rain events. Staff is concerned that due <br /> to low permeability rates, applied wastewater will run off the land application areas and could be diverted <br /> around the 84-million gallon storage pond. Until the watershed evaluation is completed, specific criteria <br /> on diversion is presented to the Regional Board, and the Executive Officer approves the criteria, all <br /> diversions are prohibited. <br /> Discharge Prohibition A.11 <br /> The Discharger has asked that this restriction prohibiting grazing animals at the land application area be <br /> changed to state "Grazing of animals on the sprayfields must be followed by discing or ripping of the soil <br /> prior to resumption of process water application." The requested change was not made for several <br /> reasons. First, the Discharger has indicated during staff inspections that grazing cows have damaged <br /> sprinkler heads, leading to discharges to the surface water drainage course. It is staff's understanding that <br /> the cows have recently been removed from the sprayfield. In addition, the RWD does not explicitly state <br /> that the Discharger proposes to allow grazing to continue. Instead, the RWD describes a number of <br /> problems with grazing animals on the sprayfields, including increased runoff and soil compaction. The <br /> RV,D states "It may be prudent to phase out grazing on the sprayfields." Finally, the Discharger needs to <br /> use its entire 200 acres of land in order to meet the BOD and nitrogen loading rates. The Discharger has <br /> not shown Trow it will be able to rotate grazing animals with wastewater applications and still meet the <br /> requirements of this Order. <br /> Discharge Prohibition A.12 <br /> This prohibition prohibits industrial wastewater from being applied above the septic system leach lines or <br /> seepage pits. Application of wastewater over a leach line/seepage pit can result in wastewater infiltrating <br /> the leach lines and traveling to the seepage pits where it can be transported vertically to lower zones with <br /> little or no treatment. <br /> Discharge Specification B.I <br /> The monthly average flow limitation of 800,000 gpd applies to wastewater flowing from the facility into <br /> the 1-million gallon storage pond. Because the stormwater which falls onto the facility is commingled <br /> with wastewater and is also pumped into the 1-million gallon storage pond, the flow limitation includes <br /> this stormwater. In a wet winter,the Discharger may need to reduce its processing activities to meet the <br /> flow limit. The flow limit is based on staffs understanding that all wastewater enters the 1-million gallon <br /> storage pond before it is pumped to either land or the 84-million gallon pond. If the Discharger changes <br /> its piping system (i.e., so that some wastewater is pumped directly to the 84-million gallon pond),then it <br /> will need to install new flow meters to meet compliance with the limitation. The flow limitation does not <br /> apply to wastewater, which is pumped onto the land application area. The Discharger is free to apply as <br /> much wastewater as necessary to the land application areas, as long as it complies with all other aspects of <br /> this Order. The flow limitation also does not apply to tailwater returned to the 84-million gallon pond, or <br /> to stormwater from the land application area which is directed to the 84-million gallon pond. <br /> Discharge Specification B.3 <br /> This specification limits discharge of wastewater or other waste constituent to storage ponds, storage <br /> areas, or land application areas at concentrations that can cause a violation of the Groundwater <br /> Limitations. The Groundwater Limitations states the discharge shall not cause underlying groundwater to <br /> contain waste constituents in concentrations statistically greater'then background water quality. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.