Laserfiche WebLink
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER NO. • -2 <br /> 6- <br /> MUSCO FAMILY OLIVE COMPANY AND THE STUDLEY COMPANY <br /> WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> e. By 5 December 2002, the Discharger shall submit a Solid Waste Management Plan that <br /> describes the sources, storage, treatment, and disposal of solid waste(including olive pits) <br /> generated by the processing facility. <br /> f. By 5 December 2002, the Discharger shall submit an Operation and Maintenance (O&M) <br /> Plan for the wastewater treatment facility land application areas, and landscaped areas. <br /> The O&M Plan shall instruct field personnel on how to manage the day-to-day discharge <br /> operations to comply with the terms and conditions of this order and how to make field <br /> adjustments, as necessary, to preclude nuisance conditions (e.g., standing water, runoff <br /> from landscaped areas, and nuisance odors from ponded wastewater). It shall also include <br /> a nuisance condition troubleshooting flowchart and a description of notification <br /> requirements if bypass occurs. Operating personnel shall keep a copy of the O&M Plan at <br /> the facility for reference. Key operating personnel shall be familiar with its contents. <br /> g. By 6 January 2003, the Discharger shall submit a technical report describing the waste <br /> assimilative capacity of the LTUs (land application areas). The report shall contain the <br /> information described in Findings No. 71 through 73. <br /> h. By 21 January 2003, the Discharger shall submit a Groundwater Well and Lysimeter <br /> Installation report. The report shall be consistent with, and include the items listed, in the <br /> second section of Attachment D. The report shall describe the installation and <br /> development of the new monitoring wells and lysimeters, and explain any deviation from <br /> the approved workplan. <br /> i. By 21 January 2004, the Discharger shall submit a Background Groundwater Quality and <br /> Percolate Quality Report. For each groundwater monitoring parameter/constituent <br /> identified in the MRP, the report shall present a summary of monitoring data, calculation <br /> of the concentration in background monitoring wells, and comparison of background <br /> groundwater quality to that in wells used to monitor all land application areas. <br /> Determination of background quality shall be made using the methods described in Title <br /> 27, Section 20415(e)(10), and shall be based on data from at least four consecutive <br /> quarterly (or more frequent) groundwater monitoring events. For each monitoring <br /> parameter/constituent, the report shall compare measured concentrations for compliance <br /> monitoring wells with the calculated background concentration. <br /> If the Background Groundwater Quality and Percolate Quality Report shows that the <br /> wastewater discharge has impacted, or is likely to impact groundwater quality, then within <br /> 90-days of request by the Executive Officer the Discharger shall submit Groundwater <br /> Mitigation Plan which shall evaluate contaminant control alternatives, describe a preferred <br /> alternative, and proposed a timeline to meet the Groundwater Limitations of this Order. <br /> The selected contaminant control alternative must comply with State Water Resources <br /> Control Board Resolution No. 68-16 and be consistent with the most recent Basin Plan. <br /> Failure to reduce the dissolved solids loading could result in reclassification of the <br /> wastewater as designated waste and/or result in a requirement to cease the discharge. <br /> V.Se by.in XmISIW?PnseiMuao:xTWP6: <br />