Laserfiche WebLink
Y <br />' Quarterly Report - August 1995 <br /> • FORMER CHASE CHEVROLET (VAN BUREN) FACILITY <br />' 424 North Van Buren Street, Stockton, California <br />' I.O. INTRODUCTION <br /> At the request of Mr Jeffery Setness of Hartmann & Setness,Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc <br />' (AGE) has prepared this Quarterly Report summarizing field activities performed during the third <br /> quarter of 1998 at 424 North Van Buren Street, Stockton,California (Figure I -Location Map) The <br />' scope of work included monitoring ground water, collecting ground water samples, obtaining <br /> laboratory analyses of the samples and preparation of this report Structures and monitoring well <br /> locations on the site and adjacent area are illustrated in Figure 2 - Vicinity Map <br />' FieId activities were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board - Central Valley Region (RWQCB-CVR) and by the San Joaquin County <br />' Public Health Services - Environmental Health Division (PHS-EHD) for the investigation of <br /> underground storage tank(UST) sites Background information was summarized in the Corrective <br /> Action Plan - December 1996 and subsequent quarterly reports prepared by AGE <br /> 1 <br /> 2.0. PROCEDURES <br /> 2 1 MONITORING WELL PURGE PROCEDURES <br />' On 12 August 1998, a Solinst water level meter was used to measure the depth to ground water in <br /> nine monitoring wells at the site and fifteen monitoring wells at the Madison site relative to the tops <br />' of the well casings An Ullage interface probe was used to check for the presence of free product in <br /> MW-3 and MW-9 The ground water elevations and hydraulic gradient were determined from these <br /> data(Table 1) The casing elevation of MW-13 at the Madison site was resurveyed relative to a City <br />' of Stockton bench mark All casing elevations at both sites were then recalculated to reflect <br /> elevations relative to mean sea level <br />' On 13 August 1998, each monitoring well at the site was purged using a two-stage submersible' <br /> purge pump The pump was decontaminated prior to purging each well using an Alconox solution <br /> and clean tap water Temperature, pH and conductivity of purged water were measured at regular <br />' intervals during purging using an ICM model 52200 water analyzer Approximately ten to fifteen <br /> gallons of water(a minimum of three well volumes) were removed from each well except MW-9, <br />' from which sixty gallons of water were purged All purged water was stored in 55-gallon DOT- <br /> approved drums on-site Field data and field logs are included in Appendix A <br /> 1 <br /> 1 Advanced GeoEnveronmental,Inc <br /> 1 1 <br />