Laserfiche WebLink
TreadweWRdlo <br />' 4.7 Groundwater Extraction, Treatment and Disposal <br /> Approximately 40,000 gallons of groundwater were pumped from the excavation and stored in <br /> 20,000 gallons Baker Tanks prior to analysis The analytical results indicated that the <br /> groundwater exceeded the discharge requirements of the City of Stockton Municipal Utilities <br /> Department (SMUD) Therefore, the groundwater was filtered through carbon vessels and <br />' re-sampled Results of the second groundwater analyses met the SMUD requirements <br /> Laboratory analytical reports for the groundwater samples are included in Appendix B SMUD <br /> accepted the groundwater for discharge in a 25 May 2004 permit that is included in Appendix D <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />' Site remediation, confirmation, and soil disposal activities were conducted at the site between 24 <br /> April and 11 May 2004 according to the 2004 Workplan After remedial work was completed, <br /> the excavation was backfilled to previous grade <br /> All of the soil excavated from 10 to approximately 22-foot bgs (5-feet below the groundwater <br /> table) contained significant TPHg concentrations The excavation soil sample (16-exc-23) <br /> collected at 23 feet bgs contained significant TPHg concentrations, but previous sampling at <br /> 24 5 feet bgs in 16B-6b, located adjacent to 16-EXC-23, did not contain TPHg On the basis of <br />' this data, it appears that the majority of the contaminated soil from below the former UST has <br /> been removed <br /> Approximately 40,000 gallons of contaminated groundwater was removed from the excavation <br /> g <br />' Analytical results from the confirmation groundwater sample indicate that the most contaminated <br /> groundwater at the site has been removed Since groundwater analyses began at monitoring well <br /> MW-3 installed in the excavation area in 1996, concentrations of TPHg have not shown a <br /> significant change, averaging approximately 180,000 gg/L, in spite of several years of various <br />' in-situ remediation technologies (air sparging, vapor extraction, and ozone spargmg) being <br /> operating at the Site The TPHg concentration in the excavation groundwater sample was 4 to 5 <br /> times lower (43,000 gg/L) than in recent samples from borings 16B-6 and16B-8, located in the <br /> 25971021 DJS 8 18 November 2004 <br />