Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 30 May 2001 <br />' AGE-NC Project No 95-0143 <br /> Page 4of8 <br />' 27 LABORATORY ANALYSES OF SOIL SAMPLES <br /> Selected soil samples were analyzed for <br />' • TPH-g in accordance e with EPA Method 8015 Modified, <br />' • BTEX in accordance with EPA Method 8020, and <br /> • Fuel oxygenates and additives - MTBE, di-isopropyl ether(DIPE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether <br />' (ETBE), tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME), tertiary butanol (TBA), ethylene dibrornide <br /> (EDB) and 1,2-dichloroethane(1,2-DCA) in accordance with EPA Method 8260-Modified <br />' 28 MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES <br />' On 26 March 2001, monitoring wells MW-22, MW-23 and MW-24 were developed utilizing a <br /> stainless steel hand bailer and a two-stage submersible pump <br /> Ground water was purged from each monitoring well until ground water was visually sediment free, <br /> approximately 20 to 24 gallons of water were removed from each well Purged ground water was <br /> containerized in properly labeled DOT-approved model 17H 55-gallon drums and was stored on-site <br /> in an area lacking public access Field sheets and data are included in Appendix A <br /> 29 SURVEYING <br /> I The casing elevation of each new ground water monitoring well installed during the March 2001 <br /> investigation was surveyed relative to MW-10 Personnel from AGE surveyed a reference point on <br /> the top of each ground water monitoring well casing to the nearest 0 01-foot relative to existing <br /> monitoring well MW-10 The results of the monitoring well survey are contained in Table 1 <br /> I3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation was calculated and flow direction was inferred from field data, the <br /> I hydrocarbon impact to ground water and soil was inferred from laboratory analysis of soil and <br /> ground water samples and field observations <br /> I <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmentai,Inc <br />