Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> • Quarterly Report - First Quarter 2000 <br />' FORMER CHASE CHEVROLET (VAN BUREN) FACILITY <br /> 424 North Van Buren Street, Stockton, California <br />' 10. INTRODUCTION <br />' At the request of Mr Jeffery Setness of Jeff B Setness Professional Law Corp , Advanced <br /> GeoEnvironmental, Inc (AGE) has prepared this quarterly report summarizing field activities <br />' performed during the first quarter of 2000 at 424 North Van Buren Street, Stockton, California <br /> (Figure 1 -Location Map) The scope of work included quarterly ground water monitoring, obtaining <br /> laboratory analyses of the samples, operation and monitoring of the soil vapor extraction (SVE) and <br />' in-situ air sparging (IAS) systems and preparation of this report Structures and monitoring well <br /> locations on the site and adjacent area are illustrated in Figure 2 - Vicinity Map and Figure 3 - <br /> Remediation System Background information was summarized in Corrective Action Plan - <br />' December 1996 and in Quarterly Report -May 1999, both prepared ay AGE <br />' 20 PROCEDURES <br /> Field activities were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the Regional Water <br />�• Quality Control Board - Central Valley Region (RWQCB-CVR) and by the San Joaquin County <br /> Public Health Services - Environmental Health Division (PHS-EHD) for the investigation of <br /> underground storage tank(UST)sites Field procedures for the monitoring of the remediation system <br /> and performance of ground water monitoring and sampling are described below <br /> 2 1 MONITORING WELL PURGE PROCEDURES <br />' On 07 February 2000, a Solinst water Ievel meter was used to measure the depth to ground water in <br /> nine momtoring wells and three vapor extraction wells at the site and fifteen monitoring wells at the <br /> Madison site relative to the tops of the well casings The ground water elevations and hydraulic <br /> gradient were determined from these data (Table 1) <br /> After measurement of depths to water, each monitoring well at the site was purged using a two-stage <br /> I submersible purge pump The pump was decontaminated prior to purging each well using an <br /> Alconox solution and clean tap water Temperature, pH and conductivity of the purged water were <br /> measured at regular intervals during purging using a Hydac water analyzer Dissolved oxygen was <br /> measured in the final purge water using a YSI model 55 dissolved oxygen meter Approximately ten <br /> to fourteen gallons of water were removed from each well except MW-9, from which sixty gallons <br /> of water were purged (approximately three well volumes) All purged water was stored in 55-gallon <br /> DOT-approved drums on-site Field data and field logs are included in Appendix A <br /> • <br /> IAdiancedCeoEmiron mental Inc <br />