Laserfiche WebLink
i • <br /> • By September 15, 2016, 2016 submit a report that contains: (i) the waste profile and <br /> acceptance plan that was in place between April 2014 and December 2015; (ii) the <br /> waste acceptance training that was in place between April 2014 and December 2015; <br /> (iii) a copy of the Special Waste Service Agreement dated August 29, 2013 between WBP <br /> and Republic; and (iv) a copy of all analytical data and shipping manifests from WBP for <br /> the period of August 2013 through June 2016. <br /> On July 20, 2016, FORWARD submitted a response to the NOV that described the <br /> impracticability of selectively excavating the WBP bed ash from the landfill and requested a <br /> meeting with CVRWQCB to discuss the NOV and the feasible options available to address <br /> CVRWQCB concerns. This meeting was held on August 12, 2016 at the CVRWQCB Sacramento <br /> office and (among other items) addressed the results of an evaluation of potential water quality <br /> impacts associated with bed ash disposal at the landfill. Following the meeting, CVRWQCB staff <br /> requested that the potential water quality impact evaluation be documented in a technical <br /> report. The results of these evaluations were documented in a November 1, 2016 Technical <br /> Memorandum that concluded: <br /> • Selective excavation of the WBP bed ash is not feasible and removal of the bed ash <br /> would require that virtually all the 1.68 million tons of co-disposed municipal solid waste <br /> (MSW) in the bed ash disposal area would be necessary to remove the bed ash.' An <br /> excavation and offsite disposal of this amount of material would cost tens of millions of <br /> dollars (or more) and would result in significant adverse environmental impacts due to <br /> truck traffic, temporary suspension of landfill gas extraction in the excavation area, and <br /> increased probability of subsurface fires;z and <br /> • The potential leaching of copper from the bed ash and subsequent leakage (should it <br /> occur) would have no measurable effect on groundwater quality below or adjacent to <br /> the site. <br /> The November 1, 2016 Technical Memorandum is attached to this letter for reference. <br /> 'Depending on depths of burial,the total amount of excavation could exceed 1.7 million tons due to <br /> excavation slope requirements. <br /> Z Offsite disposal of 1.68 million tons of waste could require about 67,000 truckloads and more than 21 million <br /> roundtrip vehicle miles assuming a hauling capacity of 25 tons per truck and disposal at the Kettleman Hills Landfill <br /> (the closest Class I landfill to Forward Landfill) <br /> Forward Landfill Response to CVRWQCB 2 <br /> Date:June 24,2017 <br />