COMPLIANCE INFO_2006-2007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The technician from Tanknology replaced the liquid sensor and retested the installed liquid sensor with passing results. The permit application for this installed liquid sensor was submitted to San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department by Tanknology. I have included a copy of the permit application(Attachment B). • CCR 2636(a): Primary containment is product tight—The 91 product line between the transition sump and the dispensers was dripping liquid from the secondary piping into the transition sump. This liquid smelled like fuel. Test this piping to determine if the primary piping is tight. Provide test results to this department. If the piping needs repair, apply for a permit for this department before starting repair work. Correct immediately. The Inspection Report states that at the time of the inspection, liquid was observed in the transition sump for the premium UST product line. On March 26, 2008, a testing contractor(Tanknology) was dispatched to complete the line tightness test for the premium UST (Ticket#8977772). On March 27, 2008, Tanknology was onsite and completed the compliance testing of the above. A copy of the passing test results is attached(Attachment Q. • CCR 2636 (c)(1): All releases in secondary piping flow to a collection sump— Three of the four lines in the transition sump had test boots which were not pulled back. All test boots must be pulled back to maintain communication between the lines and the sumps and the liquid sensors. Technician pulled the boots back or removed the inside of the Schrader valves. Corrected onsite. The Inspection Report states that at the time of the inspection, the test boots in the transition sump were not properly positioned. The technician from Tanknology repositioned the test boots in the transition sump during the compliance testing activities. It is BP West Coast Products' policy to address deficiencies, issues of concern, and/or agency request regarding our gasoline retail facilities immediately. With the transmittal of this letter and the Return to Compliance Certification(Attachment D), it is our understanding that the items of alleged non-compliance associated with the inspection dated March 26, 2008 have been resolved. If this is not correct,please contact me as soon as possible.