My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1998-2003
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
3202
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231129
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1998-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2021 4:16:13 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:44:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1998-2003
RECORD_ID
PR0231129
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0001817
FACILITY_NAME
7-ELEVEN INC #35355
STREET_NUMBER
3202
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
Ln
City
Stockton
Zip
95209
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3202 W Hammer Ln
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\H\HAMMER\3202\PR0231129\DIESEL TANK CONVERSION PLAN 2003.PDF
QuestysFileName
DIESEL TANK CONVERSION PLAN 2003
QuestysRecordDate
11/15/2011 8:00:00 AM
QuestysRecordID
162827
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm o rational? <br /> Yes ❑ No* Is the visual alarm o tional? <br /> Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors v aWl ins functionallytested,and confirmed operational? <br /> Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their pTM 0 bon? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br /> )b N/A operational? - <br /> Yes ❑ No* For prmtuized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to opqrate,or is electrically disconnected? If yes:which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply).4 Sump/Trench Sensors; aDispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection?J4 Yes; ❑No. <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank ov&fiII warning device (i.e. no <br /> JQ N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed),is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill int(s)and o ratio ro rl ? If so,at what ca percent of tank aci does the alarm trigger? % <br /> ❑ Yes* No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes* W No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply)❑ <br /> Product; ❑Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring s stem set-u2 reviewed to ensure proper sectio ?Attach set 22 reports,if ap2licable <br /> Yes ❑ No* Is all monitoring ui ment o2Mtional per manufacturer's s ifications? <br /> *In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> /11 ac <br /> Page 2 of 3 03101 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.