Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB, January 2002 <br />Page 2—of a <br />Secondary, containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br />containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment <br />testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)) <br />4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING <br />es ❑Tank Manufacturer El Industry Standard ❑Professional E <br />❑ Other peci <br />Test Method Used: essure ❑ Vacuum static <br />❑ Other (Spec6) <br />Test EquiplSerit Used: <br />Is Tank Exempt From Testing?' <br />Tank # a <br />XYes ❑ No <br />Equipment Resolution: <br />Tank # Tank # Tank # <br />es ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No <br />Tank Capacity: <br />l'5o0O 6-u ((vYe <br />15 aoo 6-41(011 <br />Tank Material: <br />Tank Manufacturer: <br />Product Stored: <br />j, q 11,Y 14 COX," <br />Wait time between applying <br />pressure/vacuum/water and <br />starting test: <br />S e..2(-'b-WLVKev1 <br />C✓t2 . <br />Test Start Time: <br />Initial Reading (RI): <br />Test End Time: <br />Final Reading (RF): <br />Test Duration: <br />Change in Reading (RF -RI): <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br />Tess Resuti; <br />❑ paAs Fail <br />❑ yoss FailPass; Q ail <br />❑ Pass ❑ klip <br />Was sensor removed for testing? <br />❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA <br />❑ es ❑ No NA 4es ❑ No kA <br />❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ A <br />Was sensor properly replaced and <br />verified functional after testing <br />❑ es ❑ No ❑ <br />Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ <br />❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N <br />Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testin-a: and recommended follow-up for failed tests) <br />Secondary, containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br />containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment <br />testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)) <br />