COMPLIANCE INFO_1999-2009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

later that day (Attachment 3). On October 25, 2005, Mr. Catanyag performed a routine inspection and witnessed the annual monitoring system certification. Secondary containment testing was last performed on August 29, 2002 (Attachment 4) and was due by August 2005. The 87 and 91 octane leak detectors also failed. An inspection report was left with Mr. Graffigna (Attachment 5). On October 31, 2005, a permit application was submitted and approved to replace the 87 and 91 octane leak detectors (Attachment 6). The leak detectors were replaced and tested under inspection of this office on November 14, 2005, and a report was submitted to the EHD (Attachment 7). On November 8, 2005, secondary containment testing was performed three months late, and the diesel line and 91 octane piping sump failed (Attachment 8). A permit submitted for repairs on January 3, 2006, was approved (Attachment 9). The diesel line and 91 octane piping sump were retested under inspection of this office on January 16, 2006, and a report was submitted to the EHD (Attachment 10). On October 31, 2006, Mr. Ray von Flue, Sr. REHS, EHD, performed a routine UST inspection (Attachment 11) and witnessed the annual monitoring system certification (Attachment 12). Water was found in the diesel piping sump and removed by the technician on site. On November 8, 2007, Mr. Garrett Backus, Sr. REHS, EHD, performed a routine UST inspection (Attachment 13) and witnessed the annual monitoring system certification (Attachment 14). Two shear valves on the dispensers would not trip when initially tested. They were adjusted and retested on site. The monitoring system certification, leak detector testing, and spill container testing were performed one month late, but were not noted on the inspection report. During the inspection, Mr. Graffigna stated that this facility will be sold in December. On November 27, 2007, a service request for a new owner UST consultation was submitted, though escrow had not closed on the sale yet. A letter was mailed to the prospective owner (Attachment 15). On January 7, 2008, Mr. von Flue received a call from Ms. Rupinder Padda, new owner, who stated escrow was scheduled to close in about a week. Mr. von Flue asked her to call to schedule an appointment for the UST consultation after escrow has closed. On December 14, 2007, Ms. Padda paid the UST and hazardous waste facility transfer fees and transferred the operating permit, which was valid through December 31, 2007 (Attachment 16). On January 31, 2008, Mr. von Flue performed a UST consultation with Ms. Padda. Ms. Padda completed all the ownership transfer forms and the property and tanks were transferred. Attachments 17 and 18 include property owner information and tank owner information for the former owner. Attachments 19, 20, and 21 include property owner information and tank owner information for the current owner, and the UST facility file narrative. 2