My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1999-2005
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KETTLEMAN
>
401
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231346
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1999-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2023 3:51:40 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:47:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1999-2005
RECORD_ID
PR0231346
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003603
FACILITY_NAME
TESORO (SPEEDWAY XP) 68152
STREET_NUMBER
401
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
KETTLEMAN
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04513019
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
401 W KETTLEMAN LN
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231346_401 W KETTLEMAN_1999-2005.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
itoring System Certification <br /> Site Address: 401 W. KETTLEMAN LANE Date of Testing/Service: 03/04/2005 <br /> na S. LEE AVE. QC-D3 <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: 122.00 <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> x Yes No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> ❑x Yes ❑No Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ❑x Yes No* Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not <br /> Yes ❑No' interfere with their proper operation? <br /> x Yes No* NIA If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station,is all communications equipment(e.g.modem)operational? <br /> For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑x Yes ❑No* ❑NA monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate,or is electrically disconnected?If yes:which sensors initiate positive <br /> shut-down?(check all that apply) El Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑x Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to teaks and sensor failure/disconnection? 0 Yes ❑No <br /> ❑ Yes ❑No* ®NIA For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e.:no mechanical <br /> overfill prevention valve is installed),is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill points(s)and operating <br /> properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? % <br /> ® Yes* M No Was any monitoring equipment replaced?If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced and list the <br /> manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ® Yes* M No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems?(check all that apply) ❑Product; <br /> ❑ Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> x❑ Yes ❑No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set-up reports,if applicable. <br /> 0 Yes ❑No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers'specifications? <br /> In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiences were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> Page 2 of 3 Based on CA form dated 03/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.