COMPLIANCE INFO_1997-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• D. Results of Testing/Sereng Software Version Installed: Co to the follo ng checklist: ❑ No* Is the audible alarm o rational? ❑ No* Is the visual alarm o rational? Rs ❑ No* Were all sensors visuall ed, functionall tested, and confirmed o rational? ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment v not interfere with their proper operation? - ❑ s 13If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. mode. Q"MA operational? Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the iping secondary containmx ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, rs electrically disco ? If yes: sensors inti: positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) ump/Trench Sensors; ispenser Co ent Sensors. Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failureldisconnection? Yes; ❑ No. ❑ Yes ❑ For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. N! mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the to fill pint(s) and o ratio ro erl . If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm tri er? ❑ Yes* No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replac and list the.manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. ❑ Yes* AT No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) Product; ❑ Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. es ❑ No* Was monitoring tem set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable Yes ❑ No* Is all monitoring ui ment operational per manufacturer'sspecifications? * In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. Page 2 of 3 0310