My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1985-2005
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HOSPITAL
>
500
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231614
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1985-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2021 12:53:34 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:50:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1985-2005
RECORD_ID
PR0231614
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0000086
FACILITY_NAME
San Joaquin General Hospital
STREET_NUMBER
500
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HOSPITAL
STREET_TYPE
Rd
City
French Camp
Zip
95231
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
500 W Hospital Rd
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231614_500 W HOSPITAL_1985-2005.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
469
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t lt- 1H t-LWI\ <br />D. •Reaults of Testing/Serviciag <br />Software Version Installed: <br />PAGE 03 <br />Complete the foil <br />at cheeldist: <br />Ycs O No* <br />Is the audible alarm rational? <br />Yes O No* <br />Is the visual sh m o bona!? <br />Yes <br />O No* <br />Were all $ visually ins ectc functional) X tested, and confumad o eaational? <br />AT Yes <br />O No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment Nd•ill <br />not in to with their r tion? <br />O Yes <br />®No• <br />If alarms arc relayed to a remote monitoring station; is all communications equipment (e.g. modern) <br />,' NIA <br />operational? <br />❑ Yrs <br />0 No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br />NIA <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br />positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) Cl Sump/Trench Sensors; ® Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did ou confirm 22sitive shutdown duo !2 leaks IW sensor failuretdiscoanection? O Yes; O No. <br />❑ Yes <br />Cl No• <br />For tarik systems that utilize the monitoring system as the pritnary tank oaxrfiil warning device (i.e. no <br />NIA <br />mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br />tlll�o s and otMratitt p�alxrly? Ii so= at wfiat t of tank ca 't�does the - tri�ser? % <br />❑ Yes* <br />No <br />la —_ <br />Was any moni equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br />and list the manufacturer name and 1 for all r lacenunt arts in Section E, below, <br />O Ycs• <br />No <br />Was liquid inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that appl)) ❑ <br />Product: ® Water. If describe in Section E below. <br />JW Yes <br />O No* <br />f Was tao ' s ern set-up reviewed to ensure projwr ? Attschsetyg Marts, if aRelicakle <br />Yes <br />O No-. <br />Is sll tnonitoriaI Sui wwnt =tional Igr manufacturer's s iFteations? <br />I in Section E below, describe how and when thiese tttUciencles were or win be C""Med. <br />E. Comments: <br />pagt 2 of 3 03101 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.