Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 2 <br /> Aris Cacapit [EH] <br /> From: BOURGAULT, DEBORAH [db5870@att.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:38 PM <br /> To: Aris Cacapit[EH] <br /> Subject: RE: UE020 Lodi-AT&T Facility <br /> Thank you Aris for your prompt response! We will proceed accordingly! Again I apologize for any confusion! <br /> Hope you have a great week! Debbie O <br /> From: Aris Cacapit [EH] [mailto:acacapit@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:33 PM <br /> To: BOURGAULT, DEBORAH <br /> Cc: Marty Weithman <br /> Subject: RE: UE020 Lodi -AT&T Facility <br /> Hi Debbie, <br /> Thank you for your clarification. We agree that a permit is not required from SJC-EHD that a permit is not required <br /> to repair/replace the audio/visual overfill alarm. A permit would be required if you needed to replace the OPW <br /> drop tube with shut off valve set at 95% capacity. <br /> Thank you, <br /> Aris Cacapit, REHS �' a <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> p <br /> 600 E. Main St. - <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> desk 209 468-3453 NOV 17 <br /> A } <br /> fax 209 468-3433 <br /> email acacapit_a s cehd.com <br /> dPSJ.JP E}cfi' ;,r <br /> ' <br /> From: BOURGAULT, DEBORAH [mailto:db5870@att.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 20112:06 PM <br /> To: Aris Cacapit [EH] <br /> Cc: Marty Weithman <br /> Subject: UE020 Lodi -AT&T Facility <br /> Importance: High <br /> Hi Ads, <br /> The purpose of this email is to obtain clarification on behalf of AT&T in connection with the <br /> subject facility. Specifically with regards to the recent Form Letter(actually addressed and sent to <br /> Kasey Foley, copy attached)you received from Service Station Systems inquiring about <br /> repairs/replacement of an overfill alarm. <br /> Upon further review of site specific documents (MRP and photos)we have determined a fill tube <br /> shut off valve is installed as part of the OPW drop tube. This is maintained as the primary overfill <br /> protection device. The valve is set to 95% of the tank capacity. This is also stated and confirmed <br /> in the most recent MRP, page 3 Section X(agency approved copy attached). <br /> The overfill alarm was installed to satisfy the fire code and therefore the form letter was sent to <br /> you unnecessarily. <br /> 11/17/2011 <br />