My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2004-2012
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1001
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231876
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2004-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 4:32:43 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:54:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2004-2012
RECORD_ID
PR0231876
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0000421
FACILITY_NAME
DINO MART
STREET_NUMBER
1001
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1001 E YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231876_1001 E YOSEMITE_2004-2012.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
417
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
El <br />D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: 1( . O <br />Complete the following checklist: <br />Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is the audible alarm o rational? <br />es <br />❑ No* <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />Q'IIs <br />❑ No* <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmedoperational" <br />Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br />not interfere with their properoperation? <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ No* <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br />i3'N/A <br />operational? <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br />❑ N/A <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br />positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) ZSumpfrrench Sensors, ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? 2`�es; ❑ No. <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ No* <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br />O N/A <br />mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br />fill int(s) and operating o eri ? If so, at what 2ercent of tank Macity does the alarm trigger? % <br />❑ Yes* <br />@`No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br />and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />❑ Yes* <br />allo <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) ❑ <br />Product; ❑ Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />Yes <br />❑ No* I <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up re orfs, if applicable <br />❑ Yes <br />o* I <br />Is all monitoring ! i mento rational ar manufacturer's s ecifications? <br />* In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br />E. Comments: 4w i c (-A,L ,�,c E <br />S 4,r r D06 -e-"- . <br />f'4L L / t kc '4>,4!�75�C -r-/4h%IC - -j `i- w t LL f`&ty<,<- 7-0 G� <br />725sP 21 P'Zal -P" :.zLz c° k,4, ws co t'itt Ey 47�3t <br />Page 2 of 3 03/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.