My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1987-2006
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOCKHEED
>
1941
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231891
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1987-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2023 2:13:15 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:54:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1987-2006
RECORD_ID
PR0231891
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003674
FACILITY_NAME
BANK OF STKN AIRPORT HANGAR #3
STREET_NUMBER
1941
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LOCKHEED
STREET_TYPE
CT
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17726034
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1941 E LOCKHEED CT
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231891_1941 E LOCKHEED_1987-2006.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
383
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. Results of Testing/Servicing • <br />Bank of Stockton <br />Metro Airport <br />Test Date: 1/27/04 <br />Software Version Installed: <br />Com lete the foRowing checklist: <br />C <br />(x) Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />(x) Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />(x) Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />(x) Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br />not interfere with their proper operation? <br />(x) Yes <br />( ) No* <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br />( ) N/A <br />operational? <br />( ) Yes <br />( ) No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br />( ) N/A <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br />positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) ❑ Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ❑ Yes; ❑ No. <br />( ) Yes <br />( ) No* <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br />N/A <br />mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br />fillpoint(s) and operating ro erl ? If so, at what percent of tank cEacity does the alarm trigger? % <br />( ) Yes* <br />( ) No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br />and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />( ) Yes* <br />( ) No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) ❑ <br />Product; ❑ Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />( )Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable <br />Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is all monitoring equipment oerational per manufacturer's specifications? <br />* In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br />E. Comments: <br />Page 2 of 3 03/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.