My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1999-2010
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
3250
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0232224
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1999-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2021 10:42:38 AM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:56:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1999-2010
RECORD_ID
PR0232224
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0001877
FACILITY_NAME
AM PM HAMMER/I5 FOOD #83113
STREET_NUMBER
3250
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
08240009
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3250 W HAMMER LN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0232224_3250 W HAMMER_1999-2010.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
437
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Facility: Hammer 1-5 Arco Page 2 <br /> D. Rest Its of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed:328.04 <br /> Com let the follo ing checklist: <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? El Outside Audible Alarm? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Is the visual alarm o2erational? <br /> 2 Yes ❑ No* Is the print function o2erational? L]Not installed. <br /> *Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visual)X ins2ected,functionally tested,and confirmed o2erational? <br /> *Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their 2ro2er o2eration? <br /> ❑Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br /> I Z N/A operational? <br /> *Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) 0 Sump Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? Z Yes; ❑No. <br /> ❑Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br /> N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> I fill 2oint(s)and o2erating 2roperly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trier? <br /> ❑Yes* ED No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all re2lacement 2arts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑Yes* 0 No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑ Product; ❑ Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> •Yes [:] No* I Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up reports, if applicable <br /> •Yes I El No* I Is all monitoring eguipmento 2erational per manufacturer's s2ecifications? <br /> * In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: The only concern was that there was a piece of metal that had fallen onto the prernim float in the 1-2 <br /> dispenser,and there was a piece of tape holding down the float in the 7-8 dispenser.Both were dry upon arrival and opperated <br /> correctly. <br /> Page 2 of 3 03101 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.